Garland Jury Finds Negligence, Awards $17,703.50 in Rear-End Collision
One driver stopped because of an accident ahead. The other driver, who was following too closely, rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to her neck, upper back, and shoulder. The defense argued the stopping was sudden and that the injuries were not caused by this accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $17,704
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On September 3, 2014, a rear-end collision occurred on Highway 635 in Garland, Texas. The plaintiff, driving a 2007 Chrysler 300, stopped due to an accident ahead when the defendant's 2014 Ford Mustang struck the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, alleging the defendant's negligence, specifically citing failure to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and brake or turn in time. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained neck, upper back, and left shoulder injuries, including a bone bruise to the humerus and a contusion of the deltoid.
The defendant contended that the plaintiff stopped suddenly and that the defendant acted as a reasonable driver, despite acknowledging a following distance of one to two car-lengths. The defendant stated a distraction caused a delayed reaction, leading to the impact. Regarding damages, the plaintiff sought compensation for past and future medical expenses, lost earning capacity, pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment, supported by chiropractic care, physical therapy, and pain management. The defendant disputed the extent and causation of the plaintiff's injuries, noting minimal damage to the plaintiff's vehicle. The defense highlighted the plaintiff's involvement in multiple subsequent motor vehicle accidents and falls, as well as a prior shoulder surgery, suggesting current complaints could stem from these other incidents rather than the subject collision.
Following a two-day trial, a jury found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $17,703.50, including specific amounts for past medical costs, physical impairment, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and lost earning capacity. With prejudgment interest and taxable costs, the final judgment totaled $21,343.81.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.