Garland Jury Awards $74,315 in Multi-Vehicle Collision
One driver failed to stop at a stop sign and hit another vehicle, which then reversed into a third vehicle. The occupants of the third vehicle claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found one of the drivers at fault.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $74,316
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Intersection Collision
Case Overview
A multi-vehicle collision in Garland, Texas, led to a negligence lawsuit seeking damages for personal injuries. In December 2014, a vehicle operated by the first defendant disregarded a stop sign at the intersection of Town Center Boulevard and Horton Way. The first defendant's vehicle collided with a second vehicle entering the intersection. Following this initial impact, the second defendant's vehicle reversed and struck the front of a third vehicle, which was lawfully stopped and waiting to make a left turn. The driver and front-seat passenger of the lawfully stopped vehicle subsequently filed a lawsuit.
The plaintiffs alleged the first defendant was negligent for failing to stop at a stop sign, failing to keep a proper lookout, and failing to yield the right-of-way. They also claimed the second defendant was negligent for reversing unsafely and failing to maintain a proper lookout. An additional defendant was named for negligent entrustment of the second vehicle. The plaintiffs asserted they sustained serious neck, back, head, chest, and shoulder injuries. All defendants denied the allegations of negligence and injury.
After a trial, a jury found that only the first defendant was negligent. The plaintiff driver was awarded $21,032.87 for past medical expenses, $6,500 for past pain and suffering, and $500 for future pain and suffering. The plaintiff passenger received $31,282.87 for past medical expenses, $10,000 for past pain and suffering, $4,000 for future medical expenses, and $1,000 for future pain and suffering. The combined verdict totaled $74,315.74.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.