Garland Jury Awards $50,049.60 in Multi-Vehicle Rear-End Collision
One driver rear-ended another vehicle, pushing it into a third vehicle. The driver in the middle claimed injuries to their neck and back. The case went to trial on the middle driver's claims only.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $50,050
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On April 13, 2018, a multi-vehicle collision occurred on Shiloh Road in Garland. An intervenor plaintiff, driving a compact car, was stopped in traffic when a defendant operating a Ford Mustang rear-ended her vehicle. The impact pushed her car into a sedan ahead, which then struck a truck. The intervenor plaintiff claimed immediate neck and lower back injuries, while the compact car sustained significant rear-end damage. Police responded but did not file a report.
The driver of the sedan initially filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant's negligence in operating his vehicle. The intervenor plaintiff later joined the lawsuit, claiming her injuries stemmed from the accident, which she asserted either caused new conditions or aggravated pre-existing ones in her lower back. She underwent chiropractic care, physical therapy, and received epidural steroid injections, with treatment concluding in September 2018. Prior to trial, the driver of the sedan settled for an undisclosed sum, and the defendant stipulated to liability for the intervenor plaintiff's claims.
The case proceeded to trial solely on the intervenor plaintiff's damages. She sought compensation for past medical expenses, future medical costs, and past and future pain, suffering, mental anguish, and physical impairment. Her counsel presented testimony from a pain management doctor, initially retained by the defense, who affirmed the medical necessity of her treatment, stated the accident caused or aggravated her injuries, and predicted future flare-ups. The defense disputed the reasonableness and necessity of the medical bills and treatment, arguing the intervenor plaintiff had been asymptomatic for three years prior to trial and should not receive damages for that period or for the future.
Following deliberation, the jury awarded the intervenor plaintiff $50,049.60. This amount included $30,049.60 for past medical costs, $10,000 for future medical costs, and $10,000 for past physical pain and suffering.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.