Garland Jury Awards $10,464 in Rear-End Collision
One driver stopped in traffic when another vehicle rear-ended her. The impact pushed her car into the vehicle in front. The first driver claimed a head injury, and the owner of the first car claimed property damage.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $10,464
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Head/Brain Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In April 2015, a 16-year-old high school student, driving a 2013 Volkswagen Beetle owned by her mother, was rear-ended in Garland, Texas. The incident occurred on Naaman School Road when the plaintiff driver stopped in traffic and was struck by a 2007 Chevrolet Impala, pushing her vehicle into a 1999 Ford Explorer ahead. The plaintiff driver claimed a head injury, and the plaintiff owner sought property damage for the vehicle.
The plaintiffs sued the defendant driver, alleging negligence for failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, and brake effectively. The plaintiff driver reported headaches and blurred vision, leading to a concussion diagnosis and ongoing treatment with a specialist. She claimed slight memory deficiencies and impaired decision-making abilities resulted from the collision, attributing subsequent behavioral issues and academic problems to her injuries. Damages sought included past medical expenses, physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment. The plaintiff owner sought damages for the vehicle's diminished value.
The defense conceded fault for the accident but disputed the extent of negligence and the causation of the claimed injuries. Defense counsel argued that the plaintiff driver's behavioral issues were consistent with typical teenage rebellion, not injury-related. The defense also pointed to a separate November 2015 incident where the plaintiff driver sustained a head injury from a volleyball, suggesting it as an alternative cause for any impaired judgment. They proposed significantly lower awards for medical expenses and no award for physical impairment.
After a two-day trial, the jury found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff owner $2,314 for the diminished value of the vehicle and the plaintiff driver $8,150, which included $2,400 for past medical costs, $500 for past physical impairment, and $5,250 for past physical pain and mental anguish. The total award to the plaintiffs was $10,464.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped their vehicle on a highway when the other driver struck them from behind at a high speed. The impact caused the driver to hit their head and briefly lose consciousness. The injured driver claimed the accident caused a brain injury, preventing them from completing college studies, and also affected their ability to care for their young son. The other driver admitted to the collision but disputed the extent and cause of the injuries.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.