Galveston Jury Finds Split Liability in Auto Collision
One driver was traveling west and entered an intersection. Another driver, attempting to make a right turn on red, impacted the first driver's vehicle. The first driver claimed neck and back injuries. The defense argued that the injured driver made an unsafe lane change and that both drivers were equally responsible for the accident. The jury awarded $1 for past medical expenses, reduced by comparative negligence.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $1
- County
- Galveston County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In December 2015, a collision occurred at the intersection of Stewart Road and 61st Street in Galveston, Texas. The plaintiff, a private investigator driving west on Stewart Road, alleged the defendant, who was traveling south on 61st Street, impacted the right rear of the plaintiff's SUV while attempting a right turn on red. Police issued the defendant a warning for failure to yield the right-of-way. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit, claiming negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle and seeking damages for alleged neck and back injuries, including cervical and lumbar sprains, strains, herniations, and stenosis.
The plaintiff testified that the defendant "T-boned" his SUV while he was in the left lane, arguing the defendant failed to keep a proper lookout, yield the right-of-way, and made an unsafe right turn on red. The plaintiff sought $12,750 for past medical expenses, in addition to damages for past physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment. Records showed the plaintiff received chiropractic treatment for several months, with an MRI revealing disc herniations.
The defendant testified she stopped at the intersection, looked for traffic, and initiated her turn after another vehicle cleared the right lane. She claimed the plaintiff's vehicle was initially in the left lane but then moved into the right lane, resulting in a glancing impact rather than a "T-bone." The defense argued that the plaintiff made an unsafe lane change and that both drivers were 50 percent responsible for the accident. The defense also disputed the extent and causation of the plaintiff's injuries, citing an 18-day delay in seeking treatment, prior back injuries, minimal vehicle damage, and the plaintiff's activities shown in post-accident social media photos. The defense further noted that records from some medical providers listed the plaintiff's law firm as a guarantor, questioning the medical necessity of certain treatments.
After deliberations, the jury found both the plaintiff and the defendant 50 percent negligent for the collision. The jury awarded the plaintiff $1 for past medical expenses, which was reduced to 50 cents to reflect the comparative negligence finding.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Galveston County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
In Tarrant County, a plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence following a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff claimed to have sustained bodily injuries, specifically soft tissue damage to the neck and back, as a result of the incident. A jury heard the case and delivered an 11-1 verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The jury found the defendant negligent and awarded damages totaling $2,226. This amount included $500 for past physical pain and mental anguish, and $1,726 for past medical care.
On September 19, 2013, a front-seat passenger in a sedan was injured when the vehicle was rear-ended by a 15-passenger van on Interstate 37 Frontage Road in Corpus Christi, Texas. The plaintiff, a carpenter, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the van driver and the driver's employer, alleging vehicular negligence and claiming the collision aggravated a pre-existing back injury. The plaintiff reported immediate back pain that worsened the following day, leading to an emergency room visit. An orthopedic surgeon later confirmed the collision aggravated a pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The plaintiff, who had a non-debilitating history of back pain, underwent physical therapy, steroid injections, and ultimately a two-level lumbar fusion. Treating physicians testified the collision necessitated surgery and affected his ability to perform manual labor. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical costs, lost wages, and pain and mental anguish. While the defendants did not dispute negligence for the collision, they contested causation and the extent of injury. The defense argued the impact was minor, noting the police report indicated no immediate injuries and the van was traveling at low speed. Defense experts opined the plaintiff's back problems were attributable to his pre-existing degenerative condition, not the accident, and that he would sustain no wage loss. Following a five-day trial, the jury found the defendant driver negligent and determined his negligence was a factual cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The jury awarded the plaintiff $563,003 in damages. The court subsequently added $32,257.69 for pre-judgment interest and court costs, resulting in a total judgment of $595,360.46 for the plaintiff.
A plaintiff driver filed a negligence lawsuit against a defendant driver following a rear-end collision. The incident occurred when the defendant, operating a sedan, struck the rear of the plaintiff's minivan. The plaintiff alleged the collision resulted in neck and back injuries, specifically cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and headaches. The plaintiff underwent conservative medical care and claimed medical expenses totaling $11,711, seeking damages. The defendant denied liability, also disputing the causation and extent of the plaintiff's alleged injuries and damages. The matter proceeded to trial. After deliberating, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The jury awarded the plaintiff $6,412 in damages.
An individual filed a negligence lawsuit following a rear-end collision that occurred on October 25, 2011, in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff, a 36-year-old mechanic, was stopped at the intersection of Wallisville Road and Main Street, waiting to make a left turn, when the defendant's vehicle struck the rear of the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent by failing to control speed, maintain a proper lookout, and properly apply brakes. The plaintiff claimed the collision caused injuries to his cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, including disc bulges and a disc protrusion. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury, asserting that the plaintiff's own comparative or contributory negligence caused the accident. A jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiff $9,020 in compensatory damages.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.