Galveston Jury Awards $5,250 in Diminution in Value Claim
One driver rear-ended another vehicle and fled the scene. The owner filed a property damage claim with their uninsured motorist carrier. The carrier paid for repairs but denied a claim for diminished value. The owner sued the carrier for breach of the insurance policy, alleging the vehicle sustained major damage and lost market value after repairs. The defense argued the vehicle's market value was unchanged and questioned the credibility of the owner's expert witness.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $5,250
- County
- Galveston County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On March 26, 2014, a 2008 Chevrolet Corvette, owned by the plaintiff, was rear-ended in Galveston by a hit-and-run driver. The vehicle sustained major rear-end and frame damage, having been in excellent condition. The plaintiff filed a property damage claim with the uninsured motorist carrier, Government Employees Insurance Co. The insurer paid for $10,670.41 in repairs but denied the plaintiff's claim for diminution in value, prompting a lawsuit for breach of the insurance policy.
The insurer conceded liability for any proven diminution in value but disputed that such a loss had occurred. The plaintiff's expert testified the vehicle's market value diminished by $7,506, based on a dealership quote compared to prices of similar accident-free vehicles. The defense argued market value was unchanged due to new parts used in repairs. It also challenged the credibility of the plaintiff and the expert, citing inconsistent testimony, biased methodology, and the use of distant market comparison prices. The defense further contended the plaintiff never attempted to sell the vehicle, claiming this was the only way to confirm value loss.
Following a two-day trial, a Galveston jury unanimously awarded the plaintiff $5,250.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Galveston County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.