Ft. Worth Jury Finds Negligence, Awards $35,145 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a traffic light and was struck from behind by another driver. The driver in front alleged injuries to their neck, back, knee, ankle, and head. The driver who was struck from behind was found to be 35% at fault, and the driver who caused the collision was found to be 65% at fault.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $35,145
- County
- Denton County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Rear End Collision
Case Overview
In Ft. Worth, TX, a plaintiff driver filed a motor vehicle negligence lawsuit after a rear-end collision. The plaintiff alleged that she had stopped in the right lane at a traffic light, activated her left turn signal to merge into a highway entrance lane, and was subsequently struck from behind by the defendant's vehicle. She claimed to have sustained soft tissue injuries to her cervical and lumbar areas, a sprain to a knee and ankle that largely resolved, and a cerebral concussion resulting in a permanent moderate cognitive deficit and periodic headaches.
The defendant admitted striking the plaintiff's vehicle and did not dispute that the plaintiff had activated her turn signal. However, the defendant argued that the plaintiff stopped abruptly, thereby contributing substantially to the accident. The defendant also challenged the plaintiff's concussion claim, noting that the plaintiff did not fill a prescription provided for the alleged injury. The plaintiff, who worked as a housekeeper, did not seek income loss damages.
A jury ultimately found the defendant 65% negligent and the plaintiff 35% negligent. The jury awarded a gross sum of $35,145 to the plaintiff. Prior to trial, the plaintiff had sought a $30,000 policy limit settlement, while the defendant had offered $1,500.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Denton County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.