Fort Worth, Texas Jury Awards No Damages in Left Turn Collision
One driver was traveling south on a street and the other driver was traveling north. The northbound driver attempted to turn left and collided with the rear left side of the southbound driver's vehicle. The southbound driver sued, claiming the other driver failed to yield the right of way, maintain a proper lookout, and made an unsafe turn. The defense argued the injuries were not caused by the accident, but by the plaintiff's pre-existing conditions and medications.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- Undisclosed
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In January 2012, a collision occurred in Fort Worth, Texas, when the defendant, driving a sedan, attempted a left turn and struck the plaintiff's SUV. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant's negligence, including failure to yield the right of way and making an unsafe turn. The defendant later stipulated to liability for the accident and causation of injury, but the extent of those injuries became a central dispute.
The plaintiff, a 61-year-old disabled individual, claimed the accident aggravated pre-existing neck and back problems, including lumbar disc bulges. The plaintiff underwent extensive chiropractic and physical therapy treatments, followed by treatment from a pain management specialist. Imaging showed disc bulges, and a spinal surgeon recommended a two-level lumbar laminectomy and fusion. A chiropractor testified for the plaintiff, asserting the accident caused the plaintiff's symptoms. The plaintiff sought over $44,000 in past medical bills, as well as damages for future medical expenses, pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment.
The defense denied that the accident caused the severity of the plaintiff's symptoms. The defense argued that the plaintiff's HIV-positive status and related medications caused neurological damage, which was the true source of the pain. Medical records introduced by the defense showed the plaintiff had reported neck and back pain prior to the accident, contradicting the plaintiff's denial. Defense experts, including a chiropractor and an orthopedic surgeon, testified that the delay in treatment, the plaintiff's pre-existing conditions, and degenerative changes, not trauma from the minor collision, were the likely causes of the symptoms.
After a three-day trial, the jury deliberated for one hour and returned a verdict awarding no damages to the plaintiff. The outcome indicated the jury likely sided with the defense's arguments that the plaintiff's claimed injuries were either pre-existing, degenerative, or otherwise unrelated to the motor vehicle collision.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.