Fort Worth, Texas Jury Awards $57,509 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was traveling on a highway when another vehicle struck the rear of her car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her neck, shoulder, and breast, including a ruptured breast implant. The other driver argued the impact was minor and the implant rupture was due to its age. The jury found in favor of the injured driver.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $57,509
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On February 10, 2016, a vehicle driven by the defendant struck the rear driver's side of the plaintiff's vehicle in Fort Worth, Texas. The plaintiff, an information-technology worker, claimed injuries to her neck, left shoulder, and left breast. The plaintiff subsequently sued the defendant, alleging negligent operation of a vehicle. The defendant denied negligence, asserting the plaintiff made a sudden stop.
The court later granted a directed verdict in favor of the plaintiff on the issue of liability, and the trial proceeded solely on causation and damages. The plaintiff presented evidence that she sought emergency medical care hours after the collision and later underwent surgery in September 2016 to remove a ruptured left breast implant, replace both implants, and perform a breast lift. She also received five months of chiropractic care for her neck and shoulder. Treating medical experts opined that the collision caused the ruptured implant, citing a shoulder-harness injury, and was responsible for the neck and shoulder complaints. The plaintiff testified to missing two weeks of work and claimed disfigurement, seeking damages for medical costs, pain and suffering, physical impairment, and lost earnings.
The defense argued that the plaintiff sustained only minor sprains and strains from the accident. They contended that the impact was too minor to rupture a 14-year-old saline implant, suggesting the rupture was likely due to the implant's age, which was nearing the end of its average lifespan. The defense also highlighted the absence of initial medical records documenting a breast implant complaint and argued that the plaintiff’s decision to replace both implants with a newer type constituted an elective cosmetic upgrade. After a two-day trial and three hours of deliberation, the jury awarded the plaintiff $57,509 in damages.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.