Fort Worth, Texas Jury Awards $25,809 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped when their vehicle was hit from behind by another car. The occupants of the stopped vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The defense conceded fault for the collision but argued the injuries were pre-existing. The jury considered the damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $25,809
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On August 13, 2015, a plaintiff and her minor daughter were involved in a rear-end collision in Fort Worth when their stopped vehicle was struck by a vehicle driven by the defendant. The plaintiffs claimed neck and back injuries. The adult plaintiff, on her own behalf and for her daughter, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligent vehicle operation. The defendant conceded liability, and the trial focused on determining damages.
The adult plaintiff claimed disc protrusions and radicular pain, while the minor plaintiff alleged lumbar sprains and disc protrusions. Both underwent various medical treatments and testified to experiencing ongoing pain, seeking substantial damages for medical expenses, pain, and impairment. Defense counsel argued the adult plaintiff's conditions were pre-existing, citing a history of back problems, a prior motor-vehicle accident, and similar MRI scans before and after the collision. The defense also presented evidence of minor vehicle damage, suggesting a low-impact collision, and noted that neither plaintiff had received treatment for over three years by the time of trial.
After a two-day trial, a jury deliberated for 1.25 hours before awarding the plaintiffs a total of $25,809. The adult plaintiff received $11,500 for past medical costs and $2,500 for past physical pain and mental anguish. The minor plaintiff was awarded $10,559 for past medical costs and $1,250 for past physical pain and mental anguish. The verdict, which was considerably less than the damages requested, suggested the jury was influenced by the defense's arguments regarding pre-existing conditions and the limited causation of damages directly attributable to the incident.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.