Fort Worth Jury Awards $487,637 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at an intersection in Fort Worth when the vehicle behind them rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed lower back injuries and sought damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The defense argued the other driver was not acting within the scope of their employment and that the injured driver was also negligent. The jury found the defendant liable and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $487,637
- County
- Tarrant County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On September 29, 2015, in Fort Worth, Texas, a property damage appraiser was driving an SUV when it was rear-ended by another SUV at an Interstate 820 exit. The plaintiff, who claimed lower back injuries, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver and the driver's employer, a rental car company. The plaintiff alleged the defendant driver was negligent and that the employer was vicariously liable because the driver was acting within the course and scope of employment. Claims against the individual driver were dismissed before trial.
At trial, the plaintiff testified that the vehicle was stopped at the time of the impact. The plaintiff's counsel argued that the defendant driver's use of the company vehicle, which was being taken home for cleaning and fueling for the next workday, along with performing job duties from home, constituted acting within the scope of employment. The defense contended that the accident occurred after business hours while the defendant was commuting home, thus arguing against vicarious liability. The defense also argued the plaintiff was negligent, asserting that the plaintiff stopped suddenly without reason after starting to turn.
The plaintiff claimed multiple disc injuries in the lower back, radiating pain, and underwent physical therapy, injections, and decompression surgery. The plaintiff reported persistent pain and limitations on activities, seeking over $330,000 for past and future medical expenses, along with damages for pain, impairment, and disfigurement. The defense disputed the necessity and cost of the surgery, highlighted a delay in the plaintiff's initial medical treatment, noted a lack of treatment in the years leading to trial, and introduced evidence of the plaintiff's travel to suggest exaggerated injuries. The defense also pointed to moderate vehicle damage and the financial arrangement with the plaintiff's surgeon.
After a three-day trial, a jury found the defendant driver negligent and determined that the driver was within the course and scope of employment, making the employer vicariously liable. The jury found the plaintiff was not negligent. The plaintiff was awarded $487,637 in damages.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Tarrant County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.