Fort Bend County, Texas Rear-End Collision Settles After Dismissal
One driver rear-ended another vehicle that was stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit alleged serious injuries and property damage. The other driver denied fault and argued the injuries were pre-existing or caused by other factors. The case was dismissed with prejudice, indicating a settlement was reached.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- Undisclosed
- County
- Fort Bend County, TX
- Resolved
- 2022
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Case Overview
On December 1, 2016, a collision occurred in Rosenberg, Fort Bend County, Texas, at the intersection of 1st and Calendar Street. The plaintiff's GMC Yukon, stopped at a red light, was rear-ended by the defendant's 2007 Mitsubishi Galant. The plaintiff filed a complaint on October 5, 2018, alleging the defendant failed to control speed, maintain an assured clear distance, pay attention, and timely apply brakes. The lawsuit sought damages for serious bodily injury and property damage, including past and future medical expenses, pain and suffering, physical impairment, and mental anguish.
The defendant initially issued a general denial of all allegations. Later filings expanded the defense, requesting a determination of liability percentage and arguing that the plaintiff's alleged injuries were attributable to pre-existing or subsequent conditions. The defendant also asserted limitations on medical expense recovery, claiming costs were not reasonable or necessary, and contended the plaintiff failed to mitigate damages or treatment costs. Limitations on lost wages and earning capacity were also cited.
The case proceeded through discovery, involving depositions by written questions to various medical providers. On June 7, 2021, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to retain the case on the active jury trial docket, and it was subsequently reset for a May 2022 trial. However, on May 18, 2022, the court granted the plaintiff's motion for dismissal with prejudice, effectively concluding the case. The specific terms were not disclosed in the available records, but the dismissal indicated a likely settlement between the parties.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Fort Bend County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
On July 9, 2013, a vehicle operated by the defendant allegedly rear-ended a car driven by the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed the defendant negligently failed to yield and ran a red light, sustaining personal injuries in the incident. On April 8, 2014, the plaintiff filed a negligence petition for damages against the defendant in the District Court, 44th District Court, Dallas County, Texas. On February 10, 2015, the parties informed the court they had reached a settlement. The agreement provided that the plaintiff would accept $7,100 to resolve all claims. An agreed order of dismissal with prejudice was entered on February 20, 2015.
On November 14, 2011, a rear-end collision occurred on the Katy Freeway in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff had stopped her vehicle in the left lane due to traffic when the defendant's vehicle struck it from behind. The plaintiff alleged the collision caused sprains and strains to her cervical and thoracic spine and left shoulder. The lawsuit claimed the defendant was negligent by traveling at an excessive speed, failing to maintain an assured clear distance, and failing to brake in a timely manner. Initially, the defendant argued the plaintiff made a sudden stop, which prevented avoidance. However, prior to trial, the defendant stipulated liability for the collision. The dispute then focused on the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, with the defendant maintaining that the plaintiff was not seriously injured and any alleged injuries were pre-existing. A jury found that the plaintiff did not suffer any serious or permanent injury in the collision.
A plaintiff driver filed a negligence lawsuit against a defendant driver following a rear-end collision. The incident occurred when the defendant, operating a sedan, struck the rear of the plaintiff's minivan. The plaintiff alleged the collision resulted in neck and back injuries, specifically cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and headaches. The plaintiff underwent conservative medical care and claimed medical expenses totaling $11,711, seeking damages. The defendant denied liability, also disputing the causation and extent of the plaintiff's alleged injuries and damages. The matter proceeded to trial. After deliberating, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The jury awarded the plaintiff $6,412 in damages.
An individual filed a negligence lawsuit following a rear-end collision that occurred on October 25, 2011, in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff, a 36-year-old mechanic, was stopped at the intersection of Wallisville Road and Main Street, waiting to make a left turn, when the defendant's vehicle struck the rear of the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent by failing to control speed, maintain a proper lookout, and properly apply brakes. The plaintiff claimed the collision caused injuries to his cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, including disc bulges and a disc protrusion. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury, asserting that the plaintiff's own comparative or contributory negligence caused the accident. A jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiff $9,020 in compensatory damages.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.