Ellis County Jury Awards $6,095,000 in 18-Wheeler Crash
A tractor-trailer rear-ended several vehicles, including a pickup truck, on a highway. The driver of the tractor-trailer was allegedly speeding and not paying attention. The owner of the tractor-trailer was also named for failing to supervise its driver. Some drivers involved suffered injuries, including a severe head injury.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $6,095,000
- County
- Ellis County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Head/Brain Injury
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Auto/Truck Collision
Case Overview
On June 13, 2014, a multi-vehicle collision occurred around 5:30 a.m. on Interstate Highway 35 near Highway 387 in Ellis County, Texas. As traffic ahead slowed, an 18-wheel tractor-trailer, driven by an employee of Olmstead-Kirk Paper Company, struck a pickup truck occupied by the plaintiffs from behind. Witnesses reported the 18-wheeler continued at near highway speeds, striking several other passenger vehicles before and after the plaintiffs' truck, ultimately coming to rest in the median. Two other drivers also intervened in the case, alleging they were struck by the same 18-wheeler and sustained injuries.
The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the 18-wheeler driver, the driver's employer (Olmstead-Kirk Paper Company), and Salem Leasing Corporation. They alleged the driver was negligent for failing to keep a proper lookout, brake timely, and remain attentive. They further claimed Olmstead-Kirk Paper Company was negligent in its supervision, training, and auditing of drivers. The defendants denied the allegations, contending the plaintiffs were the sole proximate cause of their own injuries. The company and its driver also filed a cross-action against another driver involved in the incident, alleging that driver's intoxication, excessive speed, and failure to control his vehicle contributed to the overall damages.
Following a trial, a six-member jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and intervenors. The jury awarded $6,095,000 in damages, along with post-judgment interest and court costs. The verdict indicated the jury found the defendants liable for the incident and the resulting injuries.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Ellis County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver stopped their vehicle on a highway when the other driver struck them from behind at a high speed. The impact caused the driver to hit their head and briefly lose consciousness. The injured driver claimed the accident caused a brain injury, preventing them from completing college studies, and also affected their ability to care for their young son. The other driver admitted to the collision but disputed the extent and cause of the injuries.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.