Edinburg, Texas Jury Awards $76,689 in Vehicle into Building Crash
A woman was inside a bank when a vehicle crashed through the front glass wall. She was struck by the falling glass and knocked down. She claimed injuries to her back and knee. The case was settled with one defendant, and the other defendant conceded liability for the crash.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $76,689
- County
- Hidalgo County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- back, sprain, lumbar
Case Overview
In October 2014, a plaintiff was inside an Edinburg, Texas, credit union when a vehicle crashed through the building's glass front wall. The plaintiff, an event planner, was struck by the glass and knocked to the ground, claiming injuries to her back and a knee. She subsequently filed a lawsuit against the driver for alleged negligence and against the credit union for vicarious liability. The plaintiff reached a settlement agreement with the credit union before trial, and the case proceeded solely against the driver.
During the trial, the plaintiff testified that she did not see what struck her but believed it was part of the glass wall. The defendant driver testified that she had been upset after receiving devastating news at a hospital and was driving to relieve stress but could not recall the collision. Defense counsel conceded liability for the incident. The plaintiff claimed to have suffered sprains and strains to her back and right knee, requiring extensive chiropractic treatment and steroid injections. A later MRI revealed a partial meniscus tear in her right knee, for which surgery was recommended. An orthopedic surgeon testified that the tear could have been present and exacerbated since the initial incident. The plaintiff sought compensation for past and future medical bills, and past pain and suffering.
The defense argued that a time gap in diagnosing the meniscus tear indicated it was not causally related to the crash. They also contended that the plaintiff was seeking excessive damages. After a two-day trial and 3.5 hours of deliberation, the jury found the defendant liable for the plaintiff's past medical bills and past pain and suffering. However, the jury found the defendant not liable for future medical bills. The plaintiff was awarded $41,689 for past medical bills and $35,000 for past pain and suffering, totaling $76,689.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Hidalgo County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway when their vehicle was struck from behind by a bus. The driver claimed the collision caused permanent injuries, forcing them to change to a less physically demanding job. The bus company denied negligence. The jury found the bus company at fault.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.