Denton County Jury Awards $21,262 in Rear-End Collision
One driver stopped on a highway feeder road, and the other driver rear-ended her. The driver who was stopped was yielding to traffic exiting the freeway. The driver who rear-ended the stopped vehicle admitted fault but initially denied negligence, claiming they had just finished a phone call and did not see traffic exiting the freeway. The plaintiffs claimed neck and back sprains, strains, and headaches. They also sought damages for lost income from horse boarding and housekeeping, as well as lost income from ice skating lessons for the child.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $21,262
- County
- Denton County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On March 29, 2010, a rear-end collision occurred on the feeder road of Hwy. 121 in Denton County, Texas. A driver operating a small sedan struck the rear of a full-size sport utility vehicle that had stopped. The driver of the sedan was reportedly on her cell phone or had recently completed a call. The occupants of the SUV, a driver and her minor daughter, sustained injuries in the incident.
The injured parties subsequently filed a lawsuit against the sedan driver, alleging negligence for failing to maintain a proper lookout, not keeping a safe distance, and distracted driving due to cell phone use. The plaintiffs claimed the SUV had stopped to yield to freeway-exiting traffic. They sought damages for neck and back sprains, headaches, and associated expenses. The adult plaintiff reported inability to horseback ride and volunteer, leading to horse boarding costs, and incurred housekeeper expenses. The minor plaintiff claimed an inability to continue ice skating lessons. Their treating chiropractor testified that the medical treatment and bills, totaling $7,064 for the adult plaintiff and $2,198 for the minor plaintiff, were reasonable and necessary, and that the injuries were caused by the accident.
Initially, the defendant denied negligence, stating she had hung up her phone just prior to impact and observed no reason for the SUV to stop. However, the defendant later acknowledged fault for the collision and ultimately admitted negligence. The defense contested the severity of the plaintiffs' claimed injuries, arguing that the impact was too minor to cause them. Photos presented at trial showed minimal damage to the plaintiffs' vehicle.
Following a two-day trial, a Denton County jury found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the adult plaintiff $18,064 and the minor plaintiff $3,198, totaling $21,262 in damages.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Denton County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.