Dallas, Texas Jury Issues Defense Verdict in Rear-End Collision
One driver was proceeding on a highway when their vehicle was struck in the rear by another driver. The driver who was struck alleged injuries to their neck and shoulder. The driver who struck the other vehicle denied negligence and claimed the other driver was also at fault. The jury found no negligence on the part of the driver who struck the other vehicle.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- Undisclosed
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Rear End Collision
Case Overview
A plaintiff filed a vehicular negligence lawsuit in Dallas, Texas, seeking damages after a rear-end collision on Highway 75 on February 28, 2015. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant negligently struck their vehicle from behind, causing cervical sprain and strain, a shoulder contusion, and acute pain.
The plaintiff claimed the defendant failed to maintain a proper lookout, keep a safe distance, turn to avoid the collision, and operate the vehicle at a safe speed. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury, asserting defenses of contributory negligence, sudden emergency, and unavoidable accident. The defendant also argued that the plaintiff contributed to the incident.
Following a trial, a jury found no negligence on the part of the defendant.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.