Dallas Jury Finds Split Liability in Rear-End Collision, Awards $516
A woman was a passenger in a car that was stopped in traffic when it was rear-ended. She claimed injuries from the initial impact and a second, lesser impact from another car hitting the car behind her. She sued the driver of the second car, alleging negligence. The defense argued the impact was minor and the injuries were exaggerated.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $516
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On March 21, 2014, a three-car rear-end collision occurred on southbound Central Expressway in Dallas. A front-seat passenger in the lead vehicle claimed injuries and subsequently sued the driver of the middle vehicle for negligence, alleging failures in lookout and speed control. Before filing suit, the plaintiff had settled with the third vehicle's driver for an undisclosed sum.
The plaintiff claimed the defendant's vehicle rear-ended her first, followed by a lesser impact from the third vehicle. She sought damages for alleged physical injuries, medical expenses, pain, and impairment. The defendant countered that the third vehicle initiated the collision by pushing his car into the plaintiff's, designating the third driver as a responsible party. The defense argued the impact to the plaintiff's vehicle was minor and her injuries exaggerated, supported by vehicle photos and an expert affidavit questioning the credibility and necessity of her treatments.
Following a trial, the jury found the third driver 95 percent at fault for the collision and the defendant 5 percent at fault. The jury awarded the plaintiff $516 in damages. However, due to the comparative fault finding, the plaintiff's final recovery was reduced to $25.80.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.