Dallas Jury Finds Split Liability, Awards $335 in Rear-End Crash
One driver was stopped at a yield sign when the other driver rear-ended her. The first driver claimed injuries to her neck, back, wrist, and shoulder. The second driver claimed the first driver stopped unnecessarily a second time, contributing to the collision. The jury found both drivers partially at fault.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $500
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On March 25, 2015, a motor vehicle collision occurred in Dallas, Texas, near the intersection of Webb Chapel Road and Webb Chapel Extension. The plaintiff alleged the defendant rear-ended her vehicle while she was stopped at a yield sign. The plaintiff claimed the defendant failed to yield the right of way. The defendant contended that both vehicles had stopped at the yield sign, and after the plaintiff moved forward, she stopped again without reason. The defendant stated she then rolled into the plaintiff's vehicle while looking for traffic, alleging the plaintiff was comparatively negligent. The plaintiff subsequently sued the defendant for negligent operation.
The plaintiff claimed injuries to her neck, back, right wrist, and right shoulder, later presenting with pain in her neck, back, left shoulder, left wrist, and chest, along with headaches. She was diagnosed with sprains and strains and underwent physical therapy, incurring $6,524 in past medical costs and $1,941 in vehicle repair costs. The plaintiff sought damages for past medical expenses, past pain and mental anguish, and past and future physical impairment and disfigurement. The plaintiff presented medical records and bills but did not call a medical expert.
The defense's accident reconstruction expert testified that the collision force was minimal, comparable to backing into a parking space, and noted negligible damage to the defendant's vehicle and no police report. The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and damages, arguing there was no evidence of impairment or disfigurement, and that the plaintiff's testimony regarding pain at the scene was inconsistent. After a three-day trial, the jury found the defendant 67 percent negligent and the plaintiff 33 percent negligent. The jury awarded $500, which was reduced to $335 due due to the plaintiff's comparative negligence.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.