Dallas Jury Finds Negligence in Rear-End Collision, Awards $24,584
One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries, including sprains and strains. The injured driver underwent physical therapy and chiropractic care. Medical imaging showed a protrusion/herniation in the lower back. The defense argued the treatment was excessive and the injuries were mild.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $24,584
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In November 2014, a plaintiff driving a Nissan Altima was rear-ended by a Ford Crown Victoria on Inwood Road in Dallas while stopped in traffic. The plaintiff, who sustained neck and back injuries, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligence. The lawsuit claimed the defendant failed to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, follow at a safe distance, and brake in time to avoid the collision.
The plaintiff reported neck and back sprains, strains, and a lumbar disc protrusion, undergoing physical therapy and chiropractic care for several months. Medical imaging identified a 2-millimeter protrusion/herniation at L5-S1. The plaintiff sought approximately $19,584 for past medical bills and an additional $19,584 each for past physical pain/mental anguish and past physical impairment, along with unspecified future damages.
The defense did not strongly dispute liability, as the defendant did not attend trial. However, the defense contended that the plaintiff's medical treatment and charges were excessive, arguing that any injury sustained was, at most, a mild soft-tissue strain that resolved quickly. The defense also questioned the necessity of MRIs and the chiropractor's qualifications to offer opinions on future medical needs. Defense counsel suggested an award of $2,500 for past medical bills and no other damages.
A jury in Dallas found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $24,584, specifically designating $19,584 for past medical costs and $5,000 for past physical pain and mental anguish. With prejudgment interest, the final judgment totaled $27,177.11.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.