Dallas Jury Finds Negligence in Rear-End Collision, Awards $10,950
One driver was traveling north on a highway in Dallas when another driver rear-ended him. The injured driver claimed multiple injuries, including a wrist fracture, and soft-tissue injuries to his neck, back, and shoulder. The defense admitted fault for the collision but argued that the wrist fracture was an old injury unrelated to the accident. The jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the injured driver damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $10,950
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On April 2, 2014, a delivery driver, identified as the plaintiff, was driving north on Highway 35 in Dallas, Texas, when a motorist, the defendant, rear-ended the plaintiff's pickup truck. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligence for failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, and avoid the collision. The defendant admitted fault for the accident itself.
The plaintiff claimed to have sustained a tear of the triangular fibrocartilage in the left wrist, along with soft-tissue neck, back, and left shoulder injuries. An ununited fracture of the ulnar styloid process, which had occurred 16 years prior, was also identified in the plaintiff's wrist, leading to a dispute over whether the accident aggravated or re-broke the old injury. The plaintiff sought compensation for past and future medical bills, past lost wages, and past and future physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment, totaling between $36,000 and $119,000.
The defense argued that the wrist fracture was an old injury unrelated to the collision and questioned the validity of some of the treating chiropractor's opinions on future care, noting the absence of prior wrist films for comparison. The defense also highlighted the plaintiff's ability to continue working in a physically demanding job and the lack of treatment after September 2014 as evidence against the claimed severity and ongoing pain. The defense suggested awarding significantly lower amounts for damages, including zero for future medical bills and future pain and impairment.
After a two-day trial, the jury found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $10,500 for past medical costs and $450 for past lost earnings, for a total award of $10,950. The awarded amount indicated that the jury did not fully accept the plaintiff's claims regarding the extent of future damages or the full causation of the wrist injury.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.