Dallas Jury Finds Negligence in Rear-End Collision, Awards $10,950
One driver was traveling north on a highway when the other driver rear-ended him. The injured driver claimed multiple injuries, including a wrist fracture and soft-tissue injuries to his neck, back, and shoulder. The defense argued that the wrist fracture was an old injury unrelated to the accident. The jury found the defendant negligent and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $10,950
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On April 2, 2014, a delivery driver was operating a 2003 Chevrolet Silverado pickup truck northbound on Highway 35 in Dallas when a 1996 Toyota Camry rear-ended his vehicle. The driver sustained injuries and subsequently filed a lawsuit against the Camry driver, alleging negligence for failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, and brake in time to avoid the collision. The defendant admitted fault for the accident.
The plaintiff claimed a tear of the triangular fibrocartilage in the left wrist and argued that the collision either caused or aggravated an existing wrist fracture. The plaintiff also reported soft-tissue injuries to the neck, back, and left shoulder. Medical evaluations included chiropractic care, physical therapy, X-rays, and an MRI, which indicated a ulnar styloid process fracture and a triangular fibrocartilage tear. The plaintiff sought compensation for past and future medical bills, lost wages, physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment, totaling between $36,000 and $119,000.
The defense acknowledged liability for the collision but disputed the extent and causation of the injuries. Defense counsel argued that the wrist fracture was an old injury unrelated to the accident and questioned the validity of some chiropractic opinions regarding future treatment. The defense also pointed to the plaintiff's ability to continue working in a job requiring heavy lifting and a lack of treatment after September 2014 as evidence against the claimed severity of pain and impairment. They suggested lower awards for past medical bills and other damages.
Following a two-day trial in Dallas, a jury deliberated for 130 minutes. The jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiff $10,950 in damages. The award included $10,500 for past medical costs and $450 for past lost earning capability.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.