Dallas Jury Finds Negligence in Motor Vehicle Collision, Awards $4,240
One driver was turning onto a highway feeder road when another vehicle collided with the rear of his car. The passenger in the first vehicle claimed injuries to her neck and back. The passenger sued both drivers, alleging negligence. One driver's attorney argued the other driver was solely responsible for the accident, while the other driver's attorney argued the first driver was at fault for an improper lane change.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $4,240
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
A passenger filed a lawsuit in Dallas after a two-vehicle collision on July 23, 2015. The incident occurred when the driver of the vehicle carrying the plaintiff, turning right on a red light, collided with another sedan on the feeder road of Highway 75. The plaintiff, who claimed neck and back injuries, alleged negligence against both drivers for their operation of their respective vehicles.
The plaintiff contended that her driver failed to keep a proper lookout, failed to yield the right of way, and made an unsafe lane change. Her counsel asserted this driver was 90 percent responsible. The other driver testified he was making a left turn with a green arrow and that the plaintiff's vehicle struck his during an improper lane change, arguing that the plaintiff's driver was solely at fault. The plaintiff claimed various injuries, including disc herniation and radiculopathy, undergoing physical therapy and seeking pain management, ultimately requesting approximately $9,740 for past medical expenses and additional damages for pain and suffering.
A defense expert, a chiropractor, submitted an affidavit asserting that the plaintiff's treatments were unnecessary. The expert noted vehicle photos showed minimal damage, suggesting a minor impact, and questioned the severity of the plaintiff's reported pain levels given the lack of objective injury findings and the absence of an ambulance or emergency room visit. The expert also criticized the treating chiropractor's multiple diagnoses and early MRI order.
The jury found negligence and proximate cause solely against the plaintiff's driver. The plaintiff was awarded $4,240, which included $3,240 for past medical costs and $1,000 for past physical pain and suffering. The jury found the other driver not liable, and the plaintiff received no award from that defendant.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver alleged another driver was negligent in striking their vehicle. A second driver then struck the first driver's vehicle, causing it to hit the plaintiff's vehicle a second time. The plaintiff suffered injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The parties resolved the claim for $60,750.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when the other driver, who admitted to being distracted, rear-ended them at high speed. The injured driver was taken to the emergency room with neck pain and a head laceration. Later, they underwent a cervical fusion surgery and experienced symptoms of a mild traumatic brain injury and seizure-like symptoms. Medical bills exceeded $400,000.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.