Dallas Jury Finds Negligence, Awards $28,871 in Collision
One driver was traveling north and the other driver was traveling south. The southbound driver attempted a left turn and collided with the northbound driver's vehicle. The northbound driver claimed injuries to his neck and back.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $28,871
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On August 26, 2015, a collision occurred on Beltline Road in Dallas, Texas. The plaintiff was driving northbound when the southbound defendant attempted a left turn onto the U.S. Route 175 service road, striking the driver's side of the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff subsequently sued the defendant, alleging negligent failure to yield the right-of-way, and claimed to have sustained neck and back injuries.
The plaintiff's medical care included four months of chiropractic treatment for diagnosed soft-tissue injuries to the neck and back, beginning two days after the accident. The plaintiff sought damages for past medical costs totaling $11,271, covering chiropractic care and MRI billing, and also requested compensation for future medical expenses, physical impairment, and pain and suffering. The defendant denied negligence, asserting that a green arrow permitted the left turn and that the plaintiff had run a red light.
The defense disputed the severity and causation of the plaintiff's injuries, arguing they were not permanent and were minor due to minimal damage to the plaintiff's vehicle. The defendant also noted the plaintiff drove away from the scene and did not immediately seek emergency medical care. The defense further contended that the plaintiff had a history of similar motor vehicle collision injuries in 2010 and had not received medical care for over a year prior to trial, suggesting no need for future treatment.
Following a two-day trial and two hours of jury deliberation, the jury determined the defendant was 100 percent negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $28,871 in damages.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.