Dallas Jury Finds Negligence, Awards $130,141 in Red-Light Crash
One driver ran a stoplight and broadsided another vehicle. The occupants of the struck vehicle claimed neck and back soft-tissue injuries and headaches. They sought damages for past medical expenses and pain and suffering.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $130,141
- County
- Collin County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On February 27, 2014, a driver and a passenger, both college students, were in a vehicle in north Dallas when a defendant driver ran a stoplight and broadsided their passenger side. The plaintiffs claimed multiple soft-tissue injuries to their neck and back, with the driver also claiming headaches. They were transported to an emergency room, where CT scans were negative, and they were released the same day. Later, both plaintiffs underwent chiropractic treatment and received referrals to a neurologist, which included MRIs that were unremarkable.
The plaintiffs sued the defendant driver for negligence, alleging he ran a red light, failed to yield, and failed to keep a proper lookout. They also initially sued the defendant vehicle owner for negligent entrustment but nonsuited that claim before trial. The defendant driver admitted fault, and liability was not a central dispute at trial. The plaintiffs sought damages for past medical expenses, including significant hospital charges and a $20,000 trauma activation fee for each, along with past pain and suffering and physical impairment.
The defense argued the plaintiffs were not significantly injured and that their medical bills were excessive, especially for soft-tissue injuries. Defense counsel questioned the necessity of the trauma activation fee and noted the referral chain from an attorney to the chiropractor and then to a neurologist. The defense also highlighted the chiropractor's letter of protection and the similar treatment received by both plaintiffs, further questioning the necessity and cost of MRIs.
Following a two-day trial and 2.5 hours of jury deliberation, the jury found the defendant driver negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiffs a total of $130,141.03. The passenger plaintiff received $56,549, which included $45,049 for past medical costs, $1,500 for past physical impairment, and $10,000 for past pain and suffering. The driver plaintiff received $73,592, comprising $57,592 for past medical costs, $2,000 for past physical impairment, and $14,000 for past pain and suffering. The final judgment, including prejudgment interest and taxable costs, totaled $148,093.98. The jury's verdict was 11-1, with the dissenting juror reportedly favoring a higher award.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Collin County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.