Dallas Jury Finds Driver Negligent in Red-Light Crash, Awards $40,000
One driver was traveling on a freeway access road in Dallas, and another driver was approaching from a side street. The first driver entered the intersection and collided with the second driver's vehicle. The drivers claimed various neck and back injuries, with one also alleging a hip fracture. The case involved allegations of distracted driving and running a red light.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $40,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On April 26, 2016, a collision occurred on a freeway access road in Dallas when a sedan driven by a plaintiff struck a vehicle operated by a counter-plaintiff at an intersection controlled by a stoplight. A plaintiff passenger was also in the sedan. All parties reported various injuries; the plaintiff driver and passenger claimed neck and back injuries, while the counter-plaintiff claimed a hip fracture, as well as neck, shoulder, and ankle injuries.
The plaintiff driver and passenger filed a lawsuit against the counter-plaintiff, alleging negligence in the operation of his vehicle. They claimed he was distracted by his GPS. The counter-plaintiff then countersued the plaintiff driver, alleging she negligently ran a red light. He testified that he was using his GPS by listening to vocal prompts rather than looking at the device.
At trial, the plaintiff driver and passenger detailed their medical treatments, which included chiropractic care, MRIs, and X-rays for various neck and back issues. The counter-plaintiff also sought chiropractic care and pain medication for his injuries, though he did not pursue treatment for his hip fracture after an initial hospital stay. Defense counsel for the plaintiff driver and passenger argued that any disc problems were degenerative and noted inconsistencies in the plaintiff driver's reports of prior back pain. The defense also highlighted the plaintiff passenger's deposition testimony, where she stated she had fully recovered by the time of trial.
After two days of trial, a Dallas jury deliberated for two hours and found only the plaintiff driver negligent. The jury awarded the counter-plaintiff $40,000 for past medical costs, pain, and mental anguish. The jury did not reach a decision on damages for the plaintiff driver and passenger.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver alleged another driver was negligent in striking their vehicle. A second driver then struck the first driver's vehicle, causing it to hit the plaintiff's vehicle a second time. The plaintiff suffered injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The parties resolved the claim for $60,750.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when the other driver, who admitted to being distracted, rear-ended them at high speed. The injured driver was taken to the emergency room with neck pain and a head laceration. Later, they underwent a cervical fusion surgery and experienced symptoms of a mild traumatic brain injury and seizure-like symptoms. Medical bills exceeded $400,000.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.