Dallas Jury Finds Breach of Warranty of Title, Awards $25,565
One driver bought a used car, but it broke down shortly after purchase. The seller refused to pay for repairs or provide a title. The buyer sued the seller for deceptive trade practices and breach of warranty. A jury found in favor of the buyer.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $25,565
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Accident
Case Overview
A jewelry store owner purchased a used 1998 BMW M3 from a used car dealer in Dallas for $9,500 on June 29, 2015. Two days later, the plaintiff's nephew picked up the vehicle, which overheated and stalled within two miles of the dealership. The car required major repairs, but the defendant refused to pay for them or refund the purchase price. The defendant also failed to apply for a certificate of title in the purchaser's name.
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging deceptive trade practices, specifically a breach of the warranty of title. The defendant argued that it could not apply for a new title until the vehicle was inspected and claimed it had requested the plaintiff to arrange this inspection, which the plaintiff allegedly failed to do. The plaintiff denied receiving such a request. The jury received instructions on a seller's legal obligation to transfer good title and deliver a properly assigned title at the time of vehicle delivery.
Following a two-day trial, a Dallas jury found that the defendant breached the warranty of title. The jury awarded the plaintiff $9,500 for the vehicle's purchase price and an additional $16,065 for attorney fees, totaling $25,565.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.