Verdictly
Verdict-Defense
Dallas County • 2016

Dallas Jury Awards No Damages in Texas Rear-End Collision

One driver stopped at a red light when the vehicle behind her rear-ended her. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to her neck and back. The driver who hit her admitted fault for the collision. The defense argued that the impact was minor and did not cause significant injury.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Defense
Amount
Undisclosed
County
Dallas County, TX
Resolved
2016

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Overview

On June 27, 2013, a collision occurred on northbound Hampton Road at Davis Street in Dallas, Texas. The plaintiff was stopped at a red light when the defendant's Chevrolet Avalanche rear-ended the plaintiff's Buick Century sedan. The plaintiff, who was driving with her young son, subsequently sued the defendant, alleging the defendant's negligence caused her to suffer neck and back injuries. The defendant stipulated to liability for the collision itself.

The plaintiff claimed to have sustained headaches, neck and back injuries, including disc herniations and protrusions. She sought chiropractic and physical therapy treatment, as well as cervical trigger point injections. Her chiropractor opined that these injuries were a direct result of the accident. The plaintiff also sought damages for her son, who she claimed experienced back pain, though a medical doctor found no injuries. The plaintiff asserted the impact was forceful, causing visible damage to both vehicles, and sought over $19,000 for past medical bills, nearly $1,000 for her son's past medical bills, and additional damages for future medical expenses, pain, and impairment.

The defense denied that the accident caused the plaintiff's claimed injuries. The defendant testified that her vehicle rolled into the plaintiff's bumper at less than 5 mph, describing the impact as minor with no visible damage. A defense chiropractic expert, also providing accident reconstruction and biomechanics testimony, similarly opined that the impact speed was minimal and that the plaintiffs could not have sustained significant injuries. The defense also highlighted a gap in the plaintiff's initial chiropractic treatment.

Following a two-day trial and two hours of deliberation, the jury returned a verdict for the defense. The jury awarded the plaintiff no damages, concluding that the accident, despite the defendant's admitted liability for the collision, did not cause the significant injuries claimed by the plaintiff.

VerdictlyTM Score

95
/100
Highly Fair

This outcome aligns very well with similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Need results like this for your case?

Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$7,100
Settlement
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Economic Injury

On July 9, 2013, a vehicle operated by the defendant allegedly rear-ended a car driven by the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed the defendant negligently failed to yield and ran a red light, sustaining personal injuries in the incident. On April 8, 2014, the plaintiff filed a negligence petition for damages against the defendant in the District Court, 44th District Court, Dallas County, Texas. On February 10, 2015, the parties informed the court they had reached a settlement. The agreement provided that the plaintiff would accept $7,100 to resolve all claims. An agreed order of dismissal with prejudice was entered on February 20, 2015.

Dallas County • 2015
View full case
Undisclosed
Verdict-Defense
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On November 14, 2011, a rear-end collision occurred on the Katy Freeway in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff had stopped her vehicle in the left lane due to traffic when the defendant's vehicle struck it from behind. The plaintiff alleged the collision caused sprains and strains to her cervical and thoracic spine and left shoulder. The lawsuit claimed the defendant was negligent by traveling at an excessive speed, failing to maintain an assured clear distance, and failing to brake in a timely manner. Initially, the defendant argued the plaintiff made a sudden stop, which prevented avoidance. However, prior to trial, the defendant stipulated liability for the collision. The dispute then focused on the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, with the defendant maintaining that the plaintiff was not seriously injured and any alleged injuries were pre-existing. A jury found that the plaintiff did not suffer any serious or permanent injury in the collision.

Harris County • 2015
View full case
$563,003
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On September 19, 2013, a front-seat passenger in a sedan was injured when the vehicle was rear-ended by a 15-passenger van on Interstate 37 Frontage Road in Corpus Christi, Texas. The plaintiff, a carpenter, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the van driver and the driver's employer, alleging vehicular negligence and claiming the collision aggravated a pre-existing back injury. The plaintiff reported immediate back pain that worsened the following day, leading to an emergency room visit. An orthopedic surgeon later confirmed the collision aggravated a pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The plaintiff, who had a non-debilitating history of back pain, underwent physical therapy, steroid injections, and ultimately a two-level lumbar fusion. Treating physicians testified the collision necessitated surgery and affected his ability to perform manual labor. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical costs, lost wages, and pain and mental anguish. While the defendants did not dispute negligence for the collision, they contested causation and the extent of injury. The defense argued the impact was minor, noting the police report indicated no immediate injuries and the van was traveling at low speed. Defense experts opined the plaintiff's back problems were attributable to his pre-existing degenerative condition, not the accident, and that he would sustain no wage loss. Following a five-day trial, the jury found the defendant driver negligent and determined his negligence was a factual cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The jury awarded the plaintiff $563,003 in damages. The court subsequently added $32,257.69 for pre-judgment interest and court costs, resulting in a total judgment of $595,360.46 for the plaintiff.

Nueces County • 2015
View full case
$6,412
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

A plaintiff driver filed a negligence lawsuit against a defendant driver following a rear-end collision. The incident occurred when the defendant, operating a sedan, struck the rear of the plaintiff's minivan. The plaintiff alleged the collision resulted in neck and back injuries, specifically cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and headaches. The plaintiff underwent conservative medical care and claimed medical expenses totaling $11,711, seeking damages. The defendant denied liability, also disputing the causation and extent of the plaintiff's alleged injuries and damages. The matter proceeded to trial. After deliberating, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The jury awarded the plaintiff $6,412 in damages.

Tarrant County • 2015
View full case
$9,020
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

An individual filed a negligence lawsuit following a rear-end collision that occurred on October 25, 2011, in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff, a 36-year-old mechanic, was stopped at the intersection of Wallisville Road and Main Street, waiting to make a left turn, when the defendant's vehicle struck the rear of the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent by failing to control speed, maintain a proper lookout, and properly apply brakes. The plaintiff claimed the collision caused injuries to his cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, including disc bulges and a disc protrusion. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury, asserting that the plaintiff's own comparative or contributory negligence caused the accident. A jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiff $9,020 in compensatory damages.

Harris County • 2015
View full case