Dallas Jury Awards $7,145 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped in traffic when another driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed neck and back injuries, headaches, and pain. They sought compensation for past medical expenses and pain and suffering. The defense questioned the necessity and cost of some treatments.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $7,145
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On August 5, 2014, a rear-end collision occurred in Dallas, Texas. The plaintiff, an office worker, was stopped in traffic when a vehicle operated by the defendant struck her car. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant's negligence, citing a failure to maintain a proper lookout and control speed. The defendant stipulated to liability for the collision.
The plaintiff claimed neck and back strains, sprains, and headaches, requiring physical therapy and causing her to quit her job due to pain. She sought $15,995 for past medical expenses and an additional $10,000 for past and future physical pain and mental anguish. The defense, while stipulating liability for the accident, disputed the extent of the plaintiff's damages. A defense chiropractor submitted an affidavit challenging the necessity and cost of the plaintiff's treatment, pointing out gaps in medical records and excessive charges. The defense also highlighted the plaintiff's lack of follow-up with a primary care doctor as instructed by the emergency room and an attorney referral for subsequent chiropractic treatment, suggesting a jury award of $6,645 for medical bills.
After a one-day trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $7,145. The award included $6,645 for past medical costs and $500 for past physical pain and mental anguish. The jury's award for medical expenses matched the amount suggested by the defense.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.