Dallas Jury Awards $7,000 for Rear-End Collision Negligence
One driver was stopped in traffic when the other driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed neck and back pain from the collision. The case proceeded to trial on injuries and damages after the at-fault driver admitted fault. The jury awarded damages for past medical expenses.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $7,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On July 1, 2014, in Dallas, a plaintiff was involved in a rear-end collision with a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff subsequently presented to an emergency room and was diagnosed with neck and back soft-tissue injuries, for which she underwent five months of chiropractic care. The plaintiff claimed residual pain and limitations in daily activities. She then sued the defendant, alleging negligence in the operation of the vehicle.
The defendant conceded liability for the collision, and the trial proceeded solely to determine the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and damages. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical expenses, pain and suffering, and physical impairment, suggesting a jury award of $250,000. The defense argued that the plaintiff had made a good recovery and did not sustain a permanent injury. The defense also presented photographs suggesting a low-speed, light impact with no visible damage to either vehicle.
After a two-day trial, the jury deliberated for 30 minutes before returning a verdict. The jury awarded the plaintiff $7,000 for past medical costs.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.