Dallas Jury Awards $6,350 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a traffic light when the other driver rear-ended her vehicle. Both occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries, including neck and back strains, headaches, and nausea. One occupant also claimed a shoulder sprain, and the other claimed a disc protrusion in her neck. Medical treatment included emergency room visits, chiropractic care, and physical therapy. The defense argued the accident was too minor to have caused the claimed injuries.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $6,350
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In June 2014, a sedan driven by one plaintiff, carrying her daughter as a passenger, was rear-ended by another sedan on Hampton Road in Dallas, Texas. The collision occurred when the plaintiffs' vehicle was stopped at a light at Fort Worth Avenue. The plaintiffs subsequently claimed multiple injuries, including neck and back sprains and strains, headaches, concussion, nausea, and insomnia for both individuals, along with a shoulder sprain for the daughter and a disc protrusion for the mother.
The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging negligence for failing to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, avoid following too closely, and brake or turn in time to prevent the collision. The defendant did not attend the trial, and the defense stipulated to liability for the incident itself. The plaintiffs sought damages totaling over $32,000 for past medical bills, as well as compensation for past and future physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment.
During the trial, the plaintiffs described treating at an emergency room, followed by chiropractic care and physical therapy at an injury clinic, where the mother also received pain medication and an MRI showing the disc protrusion. They claimed ongoing pain at the time of trial. The defense, however, introduced expert testimony challenging the extent of the plaintiffs' injuries. A biomechanical expert testified that the accident was too minor to cause injury, comparing the vehicle's acceleration rate to that of a human cough. A chiropractic expert for the defense opined that while the mother's emergency room visit was reasonable, her subsequent treatments were medically unnecessary. The defense also questioned the daughter's emergency room visit, noting her lack of pain complaints until arriving at the hospital. The defendant stated she had stopped behind the plaintiffs before accidentally rolling forward and lightly bumping their vehicle.
After deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding a total of $6,350. The award included $4,850 for the mother's past medical costs and $1,000 for her past physical pain and mental anguish, along with $500 for the daughter's past physical pain and mental anguish. The jury's award was considerably less than the damages sought by the plaintiffs, suggesting the jury largely accepted the defense's arguments regarding the limited extent and causation of the claimed injuries, despite the defendant admitting fault for the collision.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
On July 9, 2013, a vehicle operated by the defendant allegedly rear-ended a car driven by the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed the defendant negligently failed to yield and ran a red light, sustaining personal injuries in the incident. On April 8, 2014, the plaintiff filed a negligence petition for damages against the defendant in the District Court, 44th District Court, Dallas County, Texas. On February 10, 2015, the parties informed the court they had reached a settlement. The agreement provided that the plaintiff would accept $7,100 to resolve all claims. An agreed order of dismissal with prejudice was entered on February 20, 2015.
On September 19, 2013, a front-seat passenger in a sedan was injured when the vehicle was rear-ended by a 15-passenger van on Interstate 37 Frontage Road in Corpus Christi, Texas. The plaintiff, a carpenter, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the van driver and the driver's employer, alleging vehicular negligence and claiming the collision aggravated a pre-existing back injury. The plaintiff reported immediate back pain that worsened the following day, leading to an emergency room visit. An orthopedic surgeon later confirmed the collision aggravated a pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The plaintiff, who had a non-debilitating history of back pain, underwent physical therapy, steroid injections, and ultimately a two-level lumbar fusion. Treating physicians testified the collision necessitated surgery and affected his ability to perform manual labor. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical costs, lost wages, and pain and mental anguish. While the defendants did not dispute negligence for the collision, they contested causation and the extent of injury. The defense argued the impact was minor, noting the police report indicated no immediate injuries and the van was traveling at low speed. Defense experts opined the plaintiff's back problems were attributable to his pre-existing degenerative condition, not the accident, and that he would sustain no wage loss. Following a five-day trial, the jury found the defendant driver negligent and determined his negligence was a factual cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The jury awarded the plaintiff $563,003 in damages. The court subsequently added $32,257.69 for pre-judgment interest and court costs, resulting in a total judgment of $595,360.46 for the plaintiff.
A plaintiff driver filed a negligence lawsuit against a defendant driver following a rear-end collision. The incident occurred when the defendant, operating a sedan, struck the rear of the plaintiff's minivan. The plaintiff alleged the collision resulted in neck and back injuries, specifically cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and headaches. The plaintiff underwent conservative medical care and claimed medical expenses totaling $11,711, seeking damages. The defendant denied liability, also disputing the causation and extent of the plaintiff's alleged injuries and damages. The matter proceeded to trial. After deliberating, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The jury awarded the plaintiff $6,412 in damages.
An individual filed a negligence lawsuit following a rear-end collision that occurred on October 25, 2011, in Houston, Texas. The plaintiff, a 36-year-old mechanic, was stopped at the intersection of Wallisville Road and Main Street, waiting to make a left turn, when the defendant's vehicle struck the rear of the plaintiff's car. The plaintiff alleged the defendant was negligent by failing to control speed, maintain a proper lookout, and properly apply brakes. The plaintiff claimed the collision caused injuries to his cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine, including disc bulges and a disc protrusion. The defendant denied all allegations of negligence and injury, asserting that the plaintiff's own comparative or contributory negligence caused the accident. A jury found the defendant negligent and awarded the plaintiff $9,020 in compensatory damages.
A plaintiff filed a lawsuit alleging negligence after a defendant's vehicle struck the plaintiff's automobile, causing the rear window to shatter. The plaintiff claimed to suffer neck and back injuries, diagnosed as cervical and lumbar sprain/strain, and reported ongoing back spasms and pain despite physical therapy. The defendant denied the negligence allegations, disputed liability, and challenged the nature, extent, and damages associated with the plaintiff's alleged injuries. The case proceeded to trial in Texas. Following deliberations, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $16,500 in damages.