Dallas Jury Awards $45,319 for Transit Bus Negligence
One driver was traveling northbound and stopped at an intersection. The other driver, operating a bus, attempted a right turn and struck the plaintiff's vehicle. The collision caused injuries to the plaintiff's neck and back.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $45,319
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2022
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Multi-vehicle
- Case Type
- Transit Authority Negligence, Vehicle negligence, Bus negligence, Rights
Case Overview
A plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit against a transit authority after her vehicle was struck by one of its buses on August 15, 2018, in Dallas, Texas. The incident occurred at the intersection of Cesar Chavez Boulevard and Elm Street when the plaintiff's vehicle was stopped in the far-left lane. The defendant bus operator, while attempting a right turn, struck the rear quarter panel of the plaintiff's vehicle and then drove away from the scene without stopping. The plaintiff alleged the bus operator failed to keep a proper lookout, maintain a single lane, control speed, timely apply brakes, and maintain a safe distance, resulting in neck and back injuries requiring chiropractic treatment and diagnostic imaging.
The defendant transit authority stipulated that its bus struck the plaintiff's vehicle. However, it denied being negligent and disputed that the plaintiff's injuries were a direct result of the collision. The defense maintained that the contact between the vehicles did not cause the alleged injuries.
A jury found in favor of the plaintiff. The jury awarded the plaintiff $30,319 for past medical expenses and $15,000 for pain and suffering, totaling $45,319.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.