Dallas Jury Awards $416,447 in Underinsured Motorist Claim
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another car. The injured driver claimed back and leg injuries. The case involved a dispute over underinsured motorist benefits, with the plaintiff's insurer being sued. The jury determined the accident caused significant damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $416,448
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2020
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On March 29, 2014, a 53-year-old small-business consultant was driving on Interstate 30 in Dallas when her SUV was rear-ended while stopped in traffic. The plaintiff claimed a back injury, and after the trailing driver's insurer tendered its $50,000 policy limits, she sued her own insurer, the defendant insurer, for underinsured motorist benefits. The defense stipulated to the trailing driver's negligence.
The plaintiff alleged the collision aggravated a pre-existing lower back condition, which she contended had been stable for four years. Her medical expert testified that the accident permanently worsened her back, citing changes in disc bulges, spinal stenosis, and nerve conduction post-accident. She underwent numerous epidural steroid injections and physical therapy, with surgeons recommending future decompression and potential fusion surgeries. The plaintiff sought over $1.5 million in damages, including medical expenses, lost earning capacity, and pain and impairment.
The defendant argued the plaintiff experienced only a temporary worsening of her condition, and that any need for surgery was unrelated to the accident. The defense challenged the plaintiff's medical expert, noting the expert had not examined her and was compensated. It also disputed the plaintiff's claim of lost earning capacity, claiming a job offer lacked documentation and was declined for reasons unrelated to injury.
After a two-day trial and 1.5 hours of deliberation, a Dallas jury awarded the plaintiff $416,447.96. This sum was reduced by the defendant insurer's $50,000 credit from the policy payout, with the plaintiff's recovery ultimately limited to $300,000 by her underinsured motorist policy limit.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.