Dallas Jury Awards $4,687 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped in traffic on a highway exit ramp when the other driver rear-ended her. The injured driver claimed neck, back, and shoulder injuries. She later underwent breast reduction surgery, which she stated was necessary due to her back pain, and experienced complications from the surgery. The defense argued the surgery was not related to the accident and that her injuries did not limit her activities.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $4,687
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On February 15, 2014, a rear-end collision occurred on an exit ramp of southbound U.S. Highway 75 in Dallas, Texas. The plaintiff's 2013 Chevrolet Camaro was stopped in traffic when the defendant's 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK-class coupe struck it from behind. A police report indicated the defendant failed to control speed. The plaintiff subsequently filed a lawsuit alleging the defendant was negligent, citing claims such as failing to control speed, failing to keep a proper lookout, and driving while using a cell phone. The defendant stipulated to liability for the accident on the first day of trial.
The plaintiff sought damages for neck, back, and shoulder injuries. After initial treatment at an emergency room, the plaintiff underwent 1.5 years of treatment for soft-tissue strains and sprains. The plaintiff claimed to have eventually undergone bilateral breast reduction surgery, asserting it was necessary to alleviate back pain resulting from the accident, which then led to an infection requiring a second operation. The plaintiff sought $17,148 for past medical expenses, along with unspecified amounts for past and future physical pain and mental anguish, past physical impairment, and past physical disfigurement, including scarring from the surgery.
The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and the necessity of the breast reduction surgery. A defense expert, an orthopedic surgeon, testified that there was no relationship between the plaintiff's complaints and breast size, and that the surgery was neither indicated nor related to the collision. The defense argued that only $4,437 in medical expenses, covering initial orthopedic visits and physical therapy, was reasonable. The defense also presented evidence of the plaintiff's post-accident travels and social media photos to challenge claims of activity limitations and visible scarring.
After a three-day trial, the jury deliberated for 2.5 hours before returning a 10-2 verdict. The jury awarded the plaintiff $4,687. This award included $4,437 for past medical costs and $250 for past physical pain and mental anguish, aligning closely with the amounts suggested by the defense for necessary treatment related to the accident. The two dissenting jurors reportedly sought to award zero damages.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.