Dallas Jury Awards $24,862.23 in Rear-End Collision
One driver stopped at a red light when the other driver rear-ended them. The injured driver claimed multiple injuries including disc bulges, back and neck strains, and knee injuries. The defense argued the accident was minor and the injuries were not related to the collision.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $24,862
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On July 27, 2013, a remodeling contractor was driving a pickup truck on Dolphin Road in Dallas when a driver, working for a painting company, rear-ended the contractor's vehicle at a red light. The contractor claimed multiple injuries and subsequently sued the driver for negligence, alleging failure to maintain a proper lookout, control speed, and avoid the collision. The painting company was initially named in the lawsuit but was later removed from the case. The defendant driver did not strongly dispute liability at trial.
The plaintiff claimed various injuries, including disc bulges, back and neck strains, muscle spasms, headaches, chest wall pain, and torn menisci in the right knee. The plaintiff underwent chiropractic treatment and physical therapy, with medical records indicating an MRI-confirmed knee tear and later disc bulges. Testimony suggested the plaintiff's ability to perform job duties was impaired, necessitating the hiring of a laborer. The plaintiff sought damages for past medical expenses, lost earning capacity, and past and future pain and impairment.
The defense contended that the incident was a minor, low-speed collision, emphasizing that no police were called and no airbags deployed. The defense argued that the plaintiff failed to prove the claimed injuries resulted from the accident, suggesting any conditions were degenerative or pre-existing, noting prior knee surgery. They also questioned the necessity and relationship of some treatments to the incident, highlighting that the plaintiff was released from initial care with a good prognosis and was not taken off work by providers.
After a two-day trial, a Dallas jury found the defendant negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $24,862.23, which included damages for past medical costs, past physical impairment, past physical pain, and past loss of earning capacity.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was traveling on a freeway when their car was struck from behind by a box truck. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back and neck. The responding officer believed the truck driver failed to control speed, but also faulted the other driver for an unsafe lane change. The truck driver claimed the other driver suddenly moved into their path. The jury found both drivers equally liable for the accident.