Dallas Jury Awards $10,000 in Uninsured Motorist Claim
One driver stopped at a red light and was rear-ended by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed back and neck injuries. The other driver allegedly fled the scene. The injured driver sought damages for past medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other related claims. The defense argued the injuries were pre-existing and not caused by the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $10,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2018
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
In June 2011, a 70-year-old plaintiff was driving north on Marsh Lane in Dallas, Texas, when her vehicle was rear-ended at the intersection of Forest Lane while stopped at a flashing red light. The driver of the striking vehicle reportedly fled the scene, and police were notified. The plaintiff, who claimed neck and lower back injuries, subsequently sued her uninsured motorist insurer for benefits. The insurer did not dispute that a hit-and-run collision occurred.
The plaintiff underwent emergency room evaluation for neck and lower back pain, where she was diagnosed with lower back strains. She claimed the incident aggravated a pre-existing lower back condition. Her treatment included physical therapy and an epidural steroid injection. Months later, she underwent a laminectomy and fusion at L5-S1. The plaintiff reported residual pain, difficulty ambulating, and the need for a walker, claiming her injuries hindered her quality of life. She sought approximately $42,000 in past medical expenses, along with damages for future medical costs, physical impairment, pain and suffering, and mental anguish.
During the three-day trial, the plaintiff's treating orthopedic surgeon testified that the collision aggravated her pre-existing spinal issues, including spondylolisthesis and severe spinal stenosis, and was a proximate cause of her subsequent lower back surgery. Conversely, the defendant's orthopedic expert opined that there was no objective evidence of an acute injury from the accident. The defense expert further stated that the plaintiff's spinal surgery was not a result of the collision, noting her long history of degenerative lower back issues and opining that her post-accident physical therapy notes were nearly identical to those from prior treatment.
After one hour of deliberation, the jury awarded the plaintiff $10,000, specifically for past pain and suffering.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.