Dallas County Jury Issues Defense Verdict in Rear-End Collision
One driver was involved in a multi-car rear-end collision. The jury found no negligence on the part of the defendant driver or the plaintiff. The damages awarded were for past physical pain and mental anguish, past medical care.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- $8,025
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2022
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Neck and back, shoulder, leg
Case Overview
A multi-car rear-end collision in Dallas County led a plaintiff to file a lawsuit against a defendant, alleging negligence. The plaintiff reported injuries to the neck, back, shoulder, leg, chest, abdomen, hip, and head. The parties participated in mediation before the case proceeded to trial.
A jury delivered a defense verdict, finding no negligence on the part of the defendant. The jury also determined the plaintiff was not negligent in the incident. The jury's findings regarding damages included $5,000 for past physical pain and mental anguish and $3,025 for past medical care, totaling $8,025. However, the 10-2 defense verdict, based on the finding of no negligence, concluded the case without an award to the plaintiff.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver alleged another driver was negligent in striking their vehicle. A second driver then struck the first driver's vehicle, causing it to hit the plaintiff's vehicle a second time. The plaintiff suffered injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The parties resolved the claim for $60,750.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when the other driver, who admitted to being distracted, rear-ended them at high speed. The injured driver was taken to the emergency room with neck pain and a head laceration. Later, they underwent a cervical fusion surgery and experienced symptoms of a mild traumatic brain injury and seizure-like symptoms. Medical bills exceeded $400,000.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.