Dallas County Jury Finds Shared Negligence, Awards $12,204 in Collision
One driver was making a left turn at an intersection when they collided with another vehicle. The passenger in the first vehicle claimed neck and back injuries. The case involved arguments about who was at fault for the collision.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $12,204
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Cervical Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- T-bone
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On June 22, 2014, a two-vehicle collision occurred in south Dallas County, Texas, at the intersection of Lancaster Road and the Interstate 20 feeder road. A pickup truck, attempting a left turn, collided with a sedan traveling in the opposite direction. A 49-year-old collection agent, who was a back-seat passenger in the pickup truck, sustained neck and back injuries, including lumbar and cervical disc protrusions. She sought chiropractic care, underwent MRIs, and received cervical trigger point injections.
The injured passenger filed a lawsuit against both drivers involved in the collision. At trial, the plaintiff's attorney argued that the sedan driver's negligence, specifically running a red light, failing to yield the right of way, and failing to keep a proper lookout, was the sole cause of the accident. The pickup truck driver and an independent witness testified that the pickup truck had a green arrow. The investigating officer also stated that the sedan driver's failure to yield was the only contributing factor, a detail included in the police report. The sedan driver denied negligence, claiming a green light and attributing fault to the pickup truck driver for an unsafe left turn. The sedan driver's attorney noted their client was not interviewed by the officer at the scene due to a head injury.
The plaintiff sought $22,584 for past medical expenses, along with additional damages for past and future physical pain, mental anguish, and physical impairment, totaling $77,584. A chiropractor testified that the plaintiff's injuries and treatment were reasonable, necessary, and caused by the accident. The defense disputed the direct link between the accident and the plaintiff's disc issues, highlighting a time gap between initial chiropractic treatment and later medical imaging and injections. The defense proposed an award limited to the initial chiropractic bills, amounting to $7,204.
After a two-day trial, the jury deliberated for 1.5 hours before finding both drivers negligent. Each driver was assigned 50% comparative responsibility for the accident. The jury awarded the plaintiff $12,204, which included $7,204 for past medical costs and $5,000 for past physical pain. Based on the comparative fault finding, each defendant was liable for half of the award, totaling $6,102 per defendant. The final judgment, including taxable costs and prejudgment interest, amounted to $16,545.31.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped behind another vehicle when her car was hit from behind by a trailing car. The injured driver claimed injuries to her back, head, and neck, including herniated discs and nerve impingement. The defense conceded liability, and the trial focused on damages. The injured driver testified that she still experiences back pain and has difficulty lifting children, impacting her ability to work as a nanny.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.