Dallas County Jury Finds Negligence, No Damages Awarded in Rear-End Collision
One driver rear-ended another vehicle on an exit ramp. The jury found the defendant negligent but awarded no damages for past physical pain, mental anguish, medical care, or impairment.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- Undisclosed
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Neck Injury (Whiplash)
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Neck and back
Case Overview
In Dallas County, a plaintiff filed a lawsuit after a rear-end collision occurred on an exit ramp. The plaintiff alleged the defendant's negligence caused the incident and sought damages for resulting neck and back injuries.
The case proceeded to mediation, but no settlement was reached. During trial, the defendant presented expert testimony from a chiropractor and a forensic engineer. This evidence likely challenged the plaintiff's claimed injuries or the link between the collision and the alleged damages.
A jury ultimately returned a unanimous defense verdict. While the jury found the defendant negligent for the collision, it awarded zero damages for past physical pain and mental anguish, physical impairment, and medical care. This outcome indicated the jury concluded that while the defendant was at fault for the collision, the plaintiff did not prove compensable damages for the claimed injuries.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver alleged another driver was negligent in striking their vehicle. A second driver then struck the first driver's vehicle, causing it to hit the plaintiff's vehicle a second time. The plaintiff suffered injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The parties resolved the claim for $60,750.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when the other driver, who admitted to being distracted, rear-ended them at high speed. The injured driver was taken to the emergency room with neck pain and a head laceration. Later, they underwent a cervical fusion surgery and experienced symptoms of a mild traumatic brain injury and seizure-like symptoms. Medical bills exceeded $400,000.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.