Dallas County Jury Awards $5,258 in Rear-End Collision, Judge Rules Take-Nothing
One driver was exiting a highway when the other driver rear-ended her. The first driver claimed neck, shoulder, and elbow injuries, including a torn rotator cuff requiring surgery. The second driver did not dispute fault but contested the extent of the injuries, suggesting the collision speed was too low to cause them and that prior injuries were being misrepresented. The case resulted in a settlement.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Settlement
- Amount
- $5,258
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Shoulder Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On April 4, 2012, a plaintiff property manager was involved in a vehicle collision with a defendant driver on an exit ramp from Highway 635 in Balch Springs, Texas. The plaintiff claimed neck, shoulder, and elbow injuries, subsequently filing a lawsuit against the defendant for failing to keep a proper lookout and control speed, leading to a rear-end collision. The defendant did not dispute negligence regarding the collision itself.
The plaintiff sought emergency room treatment and later underwent surgical repair for a torn rotator cuff in her left shoulder, also claiming an ulnar nerve injury in her left elbow and cervical strains. Plaintiff's counsel contended the plaintiff was terminated from her employment due to an inability to perform job duties after the collision. The plaintiff sought $114,000 for past medical expenses, $95,000 for past and future lost income, and unspecified amounts for past and future pain and suffering and physical impairment.
Defense counsel disputed the extent of damages and causation. The defense argued that photographs showing minimal vehicle damage indicated a low-speed impact, insufficient to cause the claimed injuries. A defense biomechanical expert testified the collision angle would not have caused the elbow injury, and a defense medical expert stated neither the shoulder nor elbow injury was caused by the collision. The defense also introduced evidence of the plaintiff sustaining a prior shoulder tear from a fall two years before the collision.
A jury found the defendant liable and awarded the plaintiff $5,258.38. However, the presiding judge subsequently entered a take-nothing judgment, as the jury award was less than the defendant's final pre-trial settlement offer.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.