Verdictly
Verdict-Plaintiff
Dallas County • 2018

Dallas County Jury Awards $451,000 in Rear-End Collision

Two people in a stopped vehicle were injured when their car was hit from behind by a tractor trailer, pushing it into another vehicle, which then hit their car. The driver of the tractor trailer was found to be negligent for not paying attention, following too closely, and driving too fast. The injured individuals claimed serious and permanent injuries to their spines and other parts of their bodies.

Case Information Updated: October 2025

Back to cases
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

Case Outcome

Outcome
Verdict-Plaintiff
Amount
$451,000
County
Dallas County, TX
Resolved
2018

Injury & Accident Details

Injury Type
Lumbar Disc Injury
Accident Type
Rear-end
Case Type
Motor Vehicle Negligence, Multiple Vehicle Collision

Case Overview

On May 16, 2014, a rear-end chain-reaction collision occurred on Highway 635 in Dallas County, Texas. A tractor-trailer, operated by a defendant driver in the course of employment with a defendant excavation company, struck a pickup truck from behind. This impact caused the pickup truck to collide with a van, which then struck the plaintiffs' vehicle, which had been stopped lawfully in traffic. The plaintiffs, the driver and a passenger, claimed they suffered serious injuries as a result of the incident and filed a lawsuit alleging negligence. An initial claim for gross negligence was dismissed by the court.

The plaintiffs argued that the defendant driver failed to maintain a proper lookout, keep a safe traveling distance, apply brakes, and drove at an unsafe speed, thus causing the collision. The plaintiff driver sustained injuries to his lumbar spine, requiring chiropractic treatment, epidural injections, and eventually microdiscectomy and laminectomy surgery. The plaintiff passenger suffered injuries to his cervical and thoracic spine, wrist, and rotator cuff. The defendants denied allegations of negligence, contending that the accident was caused by the negligence of third parties beyond their control, and disputed the causal relationship between the accident and all claimed injuries.

Following a trial, a jury found the defendant driver 50% negligent and the defendant excavation company 50% negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff driver $297,500 in past damages and $113,500 in future damages. The plaintiff passenger received $13,500 in past damages and $26,500 in future damages.

VerdictlyTM Score

47
/100
Questionable

This outcome differs from typical similar cases

This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.

Need better results for your case?

Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.

Similar cases you may find useful

Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.

$1,000
Verdict-Plaintiff
Neck Injury (Whiplash)
Rear-end

In Dallas County, a plaintiff filed a lawsuit after experiencing neck and back injuries in a rear-end collision. The plaintiff alleged the defendant's negligence caused the incident and sought damages for physical pain, impairment, and medical expenses. Prior to trial, the parties engaged in mediation, but the case proceeded to a jury. During the trial, the plaintiff presented testimony from an orthopedic medical expert regarding the injuries sustained. The defendant did not present any expert testimony. The jury ultimately returned a unanimous verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The jury awarded total damages of $7,131. This amount included $1,000 for past physical pain and suffering, $2,000 for past physical impairment, and $4,131 for past medical care. The jury awarded no damages for future pain and suffering, future physical impairment, or past and future mental anguish.

Dallas County • 2015
View full case
Undisclosed
Verdict-Defense
Lumbar Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

In September 2009, a plaintiff, then 68, was involved in two separate rear-end collisions in Houston. The first incident occurred on September 13 when a vehicle driven by a first defendant rear-ended the plaintiff's stopped car after a light changed. On September 21, a second defendant, operating a vehicle for an employer, rear-ended the plaintiff's car during rush hour traffic. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against both drivers, alleging negligence for failing to maintain a proper lookout or control speed. The suit also included claims of respondeat superior, negligent entrustment, and gross negligence against the employer, though the latter two claims were later nonsuited by the plaintiff during trial. The plaintiff claimed a lumbar injury or exacerbation of a pre-existing condition, which necessitated the implantation of a spinal cord stimulator and led to early retirement. Damages sought included physical pain, mental anguish, physical impairment, and lost earning capacity. The first defendant argued a low impact speed, while the second defendant claimed a sudden emergency and noted that neither police nor ambulances were called after their collision. Defendants presented expert testimony asserting the plaintiff's symptoms were pre-existing and unrelated to the collisions, highlighting prior medical conditions, a 2008 accident, and a pain management regimen predating the 2009 incidents. The defense also noted the plaintiff did not present medical testimony. At the close of all evidence, the court granted a directed verdict against the first defendant on negligence. However, the jury found no negligence on the part of the second defendant and ultimately awarded zero damages to the plaintiff. The outcome reflected the jury's acceptance of the defense's arguments regarding the lack of causation between the collisions and the plaintiff's claimed injuries.

Harris County • 2015
View full case
$7,100
Settlement
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Economic Injury

On July 9, 2013, a vehicle operated by the defendant allegedly rear-ended a car driven by the plaintiff. The plaintiff claimed the defendant negligently failed to yield and ran a red light, sustaining personal injuries in the incident. On April 8, 2014, the plaintiff filed a negligence petition for damages against the defendant in the District Court, 44th District Court, Dallas County, Texas. On February 10, 2015, the parties informed the court they had reached a settlement. The agreement provided that the plaintiff would accept $7,100 to resolve all claims. An agreed order of dismissal with prejudice was entered on February 20, 2015.

Dallas County • 2015
View full case
$364,305
Verdict-Plaintiff
Cervical Disc Injury
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On August 14, 2014, a vehicular collision occurred in Houston, Texas, when the defendant's vehicle struck the rear of the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff alleged the defendant, operating a company vehicle within the scope of employment, was traveling at an excessive rate of speed, failed to maintain a proper lookout, and did not keep a safe distance, causing severe injuries to the plaintiff's cervical and lumbar spine. The plaintiff filed a negligence lawsuit, claiming the defendant's actions led to significant neck and back disc injuries. The defendant failed to answer the complaint, resulting in a default judgment entered by the court. The court awarded the plaintiff $364,305 in damages. This included $200,000 for pain and suffering, $14,305 for past medical expenses, and $150,000 for future medical expenses. The judgment was granted due to the defendant's failure to respond to the legal complaint.

Harris County • 2015
View full case
$563,003
Verdict-Plaintiff
Back Strain / Soft Tissue
Rear-end
Motor Vehicle Negligence

On September 19, 2013, a front-seat passenger in a sedan was injured when the vehicle was rear-ended by a 15-passenger van on Interstate 37 Frontage Road in Corpus Christi, Texas. The plaintiff, a carpenter, subsequently filed a lawsuit against the van driver and the driver's employer, alleging vehicular negligence and claiming the collision aggravated a pre-existing back injury. The plaintiff reported immediate back pain that worsened the following day, leading to an emergency room visit. An orthopedic surgeon later confirmed the collision aggravated a pre-existing degenerative disc disease. The plaintiff, who had a non-debilitating history of back pain, underwent physical therapy, steroid injections, and ultimately a two-level lumbar fusion. Treating physicians testified the collision necessitated surgery and affected his ability to perform manual labor. The plaintiff sought damages for past and future medical costs, lost wages, and pain and mental anguish. While the defendants did not dispute negligence for the collision, they contested causation and the extent of injury. The defense argued the impact was minor, noting the police report indicated no immediate injuries and the van was traveling at low speed. Defense experts opined the plaintiff's back problems were attributable to his pre-existing degenerative condition, not the accident, and that he would sustain no wage loss. Following a five-day trial, the jury found the defendant driver negligent and determined his negligence was a factual cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The jury awarded the plaintiff $563,003 in damages. The court subsequently added $32,257.69 for pre-judgment interest and court costs, resulting in a total judgment of $595,360.46 for the plaintiff.

Nueces County • 2015
View full case