Dallas County Jury Awards $42 Million in Auto Repair Negligence
One driver was operating a vehicle that had previously been repaired by an auto maintenance company. The vehicle was later struck by another vehicle, causing it to catch fire. The occupants of the first vehicle sustained injuries and burns. It was discovered that the previous repairs were not performed to manufacturer specifications, potentially compromising the vehicle's safety.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $42,000,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Burns / Lacerations
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Auto Repair Negligence, Vehicle negligence, Negligent repair, Orthopedic negligence
Case Overview
On December 21, 2013, a driver and passenger were involved in a collision on US 281 in Burnet County, Texas, when their 2010 Honda Fit was struck by another vehicle. The plaintiffs, who had purchased the used vehicle four months prior, sustained orthopedic injuries and burns after their vehicle caught fire. They later discovered the vehicle had undergone undisclosed repairs and body work by the defendant.
The plaintiffs filed suit in District Court of Dallas County, alleging negligence against the auto maintenance company. They claimed the defendant failed to disclose prior repairs, made dangerous and illegal modifications to the vehicle, and was negligent in its installations, repairs, and supervision of employees. The plaintiffs contended these negligent repairs resulted in structural failures, contributing to their orthopedic injuries and the vehicle fire.
At trial, the plaintiffs argued the defendant's alterations compromised the vehicle's structural and fuel system crash protection. They specifically cited a defectively attached roof, lacking welds, and a failed door beam that allowed fire into the occupant compartment. The defendant admitted under oath that a body shop is responsible if repairs not meeting manufacturer specifications lead to serious injury or death, and acknowledged their repairs to the plaintiffs' vehicle did not meet these specifications.
The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding $42 million in damages. The outcome occurred following the defendant's admissions regarding responsibility and its failure to adhere to manufacturer repair specifications.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their car was hit by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed injuries to their back, neck, and shoulder. The passenger in the car also claimed an injury. The case involved an insurance claim after the at-fault driver was uninsured.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.