Dallas County Jury Awards $19,000,000 in DWI Rollover Crash
A woman sued after she was paralyzed in a rollover crash. The driver was intoxicated and lost control of the vehicle. The woman was ejected and sustained paralysis. The defense argued the woman was at fault and that her family could provide care. A jury found for the woman and awarded damages.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $19,000,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Accident Type
- Rollover
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Single Vehicle Collision
Case Overview
A passenger filed a lawsuit after sustaining permanent injuries in a rollover vehicle accident in Dallas County, Texas. The incident occurred when a vehicle, driven by the defendant, rolled over. The defendant driver had a blood alcohol level of .135, exceeding the state's legal limit of .08. The 23-year-old plaintiff was ejected from the vehicle and suffered paraplegia. The plaintiff sought recovery for past and future medical damages, as well as pain and suffering, alleging motor vehicle negligence.
The defendant denied liability and disputed the plaintiff's damages. During the trial, the defense contended that the plaintiff was partly at fault, claiming she distracted the driver and had prior knowledge of his intoxication. The defendant also argued that the plaintiff was not entitled to future home healthcare, suggesting her family could provide care. The plaintiff presented witness testimony from the scene of the wreck, which reportedly contradicted the defendant's trial defense.
After a week-long jury trial in the 95th Judicial District Court, the jury deliberated for two days. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, awarding $19,000,000 in past and future damages.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.