Dallas County Jury Awards $10.9M in Wrongful Death Bus Crash
A bus carrying senior citizens crashed and overturned on a highway in Dallas County, Texas. The crash resulted in multiple fatalities and numerous injuries. The case involved claims of driver error and the responsibility of the bus company and the entity that organized the trip. A jury found multiple parties responsible for the crash and awarded damages to the estates of those who died.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $10,900,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2016
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Wrongful Death
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Wrongful Death
Case Overview
On April 11, 2013, a bus transporting 45 senior citizens to a casino in Durant, Oklahoma, struck a concrete wall and flipped onto its side while traveling on the President George Bush Turnpike in Dallas County, Texas. The incident, allegedly caused by driver error, resulted in the deaths of three passengers and injuries to numerous others.
The estates of two deceased passengers subsequently filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the Choctaw Nation. The plaintiffs contended that the bus company and its driver were operating under the tribe's control and on a mission for the tribe at the time of the crash. They argued that the Choctaw Nation paid for the bus trip and dictated the pick-up locations, drop-off points, and the route.
During the trial, the Choctaw Nation sought a directed verdict, asserting that the bus company, a commercial motor carrier, was solely responsible for the trip. The court denied this motion. On May 2, 2016, a jury returned a verdict finding the Choctaw Nation 25% responsible, the driver 58% responsible, and the bus company 17% responsible. The jury awarded $4,900,000 to one passenger's estate and $6,000,000 to the other, totaling $10,900,000.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome is within expected ranges
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Want results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.