Cypress Jury Awards $0 in Rear-End Collision Trial
One driver was stopped in traffic when the vehicle behind them rear-ended them, pushing their car into the vehicle in front. The injured driver claimed injuries to their lower back. The defense argued the injuries were pre-existing and minor.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- Undisclosed
- County
- Harris County, TX
- Resolved
- 2015
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On November 19, 2012, a chain-reaction collision occurred on Cypress North Houston Road in Cypress, Texas. The plaintiff, a 79-year-old retiree, was driving a Toyota Prius when traffic ahead slowed. A pickup truck, owned by the defendant company, subsequently rear-ended a Jeep Cherokee traveling between the plaintiff's vehicle and the pickup. This impact caused the Jeep to strike the plaintiff's Prius from behind. The plaintiff later filed a negligence lawsuit against the company, alleging its employee's actions caused the collision and his resulting lumbar spine injuries. The plaintiff's spouse also brought a derivative claim for loss of consortium.
The plaintiff claimed injuries including a compression fracture of the L1 vertebra and spondylolisthesis, which necessitated acupuncture and epidural steroid injections, and resulted in chronic lower back pain. Although one treating physician recommended lumbar decompression and fusion surgery, another orthopedist disagreed, and the procedure was not performed. The plaintiff sought $775,000 in damages. The defendant maintained the collision was an accident, with its employee driver testifying that his wet shoe had slipped onto the accelerator. The defense disputed the extent of the plaintiff's injuries, arguing they were pre-existing lumbar conditions or minor soft-tissue injuries that should have resolved. A defense orthopedic expert opined that the lumbar injuries were pre-existing.
After a three-day trial, the jury found the defendant company was not negligent in the incident. Consequently, the jury awarded $0 in damages to the plaintiff. Had liability been found, the jury indicated it would have awarded $8,500. There was no award for the loss of consortium claim. A motion for a new trial by the plaintiff is pending.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Harris County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.