Court Denies Uninsured Motorist Benefits, Awards Insurer $400
An insurance company sued a driver after a motor vehicle accident, claiming the driver was not entitled to uninsured motorist benefits. The insurance company argued that contact with another vehicle was required for coverage under their policy. The driver did not respond to the lawsuit, and the court entered a default judgment in favor of the insurance company, awarding them attorney fees and costs.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $400
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Other
- Accident Type
- Other
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
An insurance provider filed a lawsuit against a driver it insured following a motor vehicle accident on April 26, 2019. The plaintiff, Sentry Select Insurance Company, sought a declaration that the defendant driver, an employee of Road Start Transport, Inc., was not entitled to uninsured motorist benefits for the incident.
The plaintiff claimed that its uninsured motorist policy required physical contact with another vehicle for coverage, and such contact did not occur in a manner that caused the accident. The defendant failed to respond to the lawsuit after it was filed on December 22, 2019, leading to a motion for default judgment by the plaintiff.
On March 5, 2021, the court entered a default judgment against the defendant. The court adopted a magistrate judge's recommendation, finding that no "occurrence" within the policy terms triggered coverage and that the insurance company had no duty to indemnify or pay benefits. The court also awarded the plaintiff $400 in attorneys' fees and costs.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome significantly deviates from similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Deserve a fair outcome for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver rear-ended another vehicle stopped at a red light. The driver who was hit filed a lawsuit seeking damages for medical expenses and pain and suffering. The parties reached a settlement agreement.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.