Corpus Christi Jury Awards $43.6 Million in Parking Lot Negligence
An elderly woman was struck by a truck in a store parking lot. She sustained multiple fractures and injuries, requiring extensive medical treatment and rehabilitation. The woman sued the store and the driver, alleging negligence. A jury found the store 75% at fault for negligence and gross negligence, awarding the woman $43.6 million.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $43,600,000
- County
- Nueces County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Catastrophic Injury
- Accident Type
- Pedestrian
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Auto/Pedestrian collision
Case Overview
An elderly woman was severely injured after being struck by a truck in the parking lot of a Wal-Mart in Corpus Christi, Texas, on January 27, 2014. The 78-year-old plaintiff sustained multiple fractures and a severe ankle injury, requiring extensive medical treatment and rehabilitation. She subsequently filed suit in the District Court of Nueces County against Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC and the driver of the truck.
The plaintiff alleged the driver's negligence in failing to maintain a proper lookout, yield the right-of-way, control speed, and brake. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC was accused of gross negligence for lacking stop signs in congested parking lot areas. The plaintiff sought actual and punitive damages; both defendants denied negligence and disputed the damages claim.
During the five-day trial, a traffic engineer for the plaintiff testified that the lack of stop signs or markings created an unreasonable risk of injury to customers. Wal-Mart's traffic engineering expert countered that the area was not unreasonably dangerous, while its accident reconstruction expert opined that the incident's outcome might have still occurred even if the driver had come to a stop.
The jury deliberated for two hours before finding unanimously for the plaintiff. The jury assigned Wal-Mart 75% fault for negligence and comparative responsibility, with the remaining fault assigned to the plaintiff. Wal-Mart was also found grossly negligent. The jury awarded the plaintiff $43.6 million, which included $13.6 million in actual damages and $30 million in punitive damages.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Nueces County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver alleged another driver was negligent in striking their vehicle. A second driver then struck the first driver's vehicle, causing it to hit the plaintiff's vehicle a second time. The plaintiff suffered injuries to their neck, back, and shoulder. The parties resolved the claim for $60,750.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.
One driver was traveling in Montgomery County when her pickup truck was rear-ended by another vehicle in a four-vehicle chain collision. The plaintiffs' vehicle was pushed into the vehicle in front of it. The plaintiffs claimed injuries to their backs and necks. The driver of the rear vehicle contended that the accident started with the plaintiffs hitting the vehicle ahead of them. It was raining at the time of the accident.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was hit claimed serious injuries to their neck and back, including paralysis in one arm, requiring surgery. The other driver argued that a third vehicle caused the accident or that the injured driver's own actions contributed. The jury found the second driver fully at fault.
One driver was traveling south when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The occupants of the first vehicle claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver of the first vehicle alleged the other driver was speeding and inattentive, while the second driver claimed the first vehicle stopped suddenly. The first driver sought damages for medical costs, pain, and suffering.