Corpus Christi Jury Awards $33,800 in Lane Change Collision
One driver was changing lanes when his vehicle collided with the rear door of another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed back injuries. The case involved allegations of negligence in changing lanes unsafely and failing to maintain a lane. The injured driver underwent chiropractic care, physical therapy, injections, and surgery for disc protrusions and shoulder conditions. He experienced pain and permanent restrictions, impacting his ability to work as a welder. The defense argued the impact was minor and questioned the necessity of the claimed injuries and surgeries.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $52,000
- County
- Nueces County, TX
- Resolved
- 2017
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Sideswipe
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Fusion, Lumbar, Laminectomy
Case Overview
On October 8, 2014, a collision occurred north of Corpus Christi when a defendant driver, operating a company pickup truck, changed lanes and struck the plaintiff's SUV. The plaintiff, a welder, claimed to have sustained back injuries and later developed neck, shoulder, and back pain, diagnosed with multiple disc protrusions and degenerative changes. The plaintiff sued the defendant driver and his company, alleging negligence for unsafe lane changes, failure to maintain a single lane, and failure to keep a proper lookout. The plaintiff also claimed the company was negligent and grossly negligent for failing to adequately train its drivers, citing a prior fatal accident involving a company vehicle.
During the trial, the plaintiff's transportation safety expert testified that the defendant company was grossly negligent for not implementing a written driver safety program. The plaintiff's treating surgeon opined that surgical hardware would need removal due to loosening, and a vocational expert testified that the plaintiff's injuries prevented him from continuing work as a welder, restricting him to sedentary tasks. The defendant driver testified he changed lanes to avoid an obstruction and looked before moving, seeing no vehicles. Defense counsel argued the plaintiff was speeding and requested the jury find both drivers equally responsible and reject gross negligence. Defense experts challenged the injury claims, with a biomechanics expert stating the impact was too minor to cause the alleged injuries and a neurosurgery expert opining that surgery was not medically necessary.
A jury found the defendant driver 65 percent responsible for the collision and the plaintiff 35 percent responsible. The jury awarded the plaintiff $52,000. After the reduction for comparative negligence, the plaintiff's recovery amounted to $33,800.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Nueces County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.