Corpus Christi Jury Awards $232,835 in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back, including disc herniations and fractures. The other driver acknowledged being distracted at the time of the accident. Medical experts testified regarding the extent of the injuries and the need for future treatment, while defense experts argued the injuries were degenerative and pre-existing.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $232,835
- County
- Nueces County, TX
- Resolved
- 2021
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Lumbar Disc Injury
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On April 3, 2018, in Corpus Christi, a project manager's pickup truck was rear-ended while stopped at a stop sign. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the trailing driver and his employer, alleging negligence and vicarious liability. The plaintiff claimed the collision caused disc herniations and an L5 pars fracture, leading to radiating lower back pain.
The plaintiff underwent medical treatment, and an orthopedic surgeon later recommended a three-level lumbar laminectomy and fusion at an estimated cost of $129,000. The plaintiff and his spouse testified the surgery was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the spouse's breast cancer diagnosis, also describing work and home limitations. Plaintiff's experts included a biomechanics specialist, who estimated the impact speed at 12 to 17 mph, and an orthopedic surgeon, who confirmed past treatment was reasonable and reiterated the surgical recommendation.
The defendant driver admitted looking away but claimed the plaintiff stopped abruptly and that the impact speed was only 3 to 5 mph. Defense counsel noted minor to moderate damage to the plaintiff's vehicle and no visible damage to the defendant's. A defense orthopedic surgeon opined the accident caused only sprains and strains, asserting the plaintiff's disc problems were degenerative and pre-existing, thus surgery was not needed. The defense highlighted the three-year delay in undergoing the recommended surgery.
After a three-day trial, a jury deliberated for 1.5 hours before finding the defendants liable. The jury awarded the plaintiff $232,835 in total damages. This included $24,335 for past medical costs, $129,000 for future medical costs, $12,500 for past and future physical impairment, and $67,000 for past and future physical pain and mental anguish.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome differs from typical similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need better results for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Nueces County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was stopped to make a left turn when their pickup truck was hit from behind by another vehicle. The driver of the pickup truck claimed injuries to their back and neck. The lawsuit alleged the other driver was negligent. The trial focused on damages.
One driver was stopped at a stop sign when their pickup truck was struck from behind by another pickup truck. The driver and a passenger in the first truck claimed injuries. The passenger's claim was settled before trial. The driver's claim proceeded to trial, where the jury found the second driver liable for the accident.
A passenger in a sport utility vehicle was injured when the vehicle she was in was rear-ended by another car. The passenger claimed injuries to her back and neck, including bulging discs. The driver of the other vehicle claimed his brakes failed. The jury found that the driver's negligence did not cause the accident.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at a light when the vehicle behind them struck their pickup truck. The driver of the second vehicle claimed the pickup truck driver swerved in front of them and braked suddenly, causing the collision. The driver of the second vehicle alleged injuries to their knee and spine. The defense questioned the credibility of the driver's account and pointed to inconsistencies in their statements.