Corpus Christi Jury Awards $11.4M in Fatal Tractor-Trailer Crash
A tractor-trailer crossed into oncoming traffic and collided with a pickup truck, resulting in the death of the pickup truck driver. The plaintiffs alleged the truck driver was impaired and the employer was liable. The jury found the defendant driver 70% liable and the employer 30% liable.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Plaintiff
- Amount
- $11,400,000
- County
- Dallas County, TX
- Resolved
- 2024
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Catastrophic Injury
- Accident Type
- Truck/Commercial
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence, Tractor-Trailer Negligence
Case Overview
A fatal motor vehicle accident occurred on December 26, 2018, when a tractor-trailer reportedly crossed into an oncoming traffic lane and collided with a pickup truck, killing its driver. The plaintiff, acting on behalf of the deceased driver's minor child, subsequently filed a motor vehicle negligence lawsuit against the defendant company and the defendant driver in a U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division, on March 25, 2019.
The plaintiff alleged the defendant driver's negligence caused the crash and that the defendant employer was liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior, claiming the driver was performing duties within the scope of employment. The plaintiff also alleged the employer knew, or should have known, that the driver was operating the tractor-trailer while experiencing mental impairment and thus asserted gross negligence claims. The plaintiff claimed the decedent experienced conscious pain and suffering before death and that the minor child suffered significant losses, including parental guidance, support, and emotional distress. The decedent's parents also joined the lawsuit, seeking damages for loss of care, support, and companionship. The defendants disputed all factual allegations of the accident, including that the tractor-trailer crossed into oncoming traffic, and denied knowledge of any driver's medical impairment.
A jury awarded the plaintiff $11.4 million. The award included $5 million for the minor child for past loss of companionship and society, $5 million for future losses, and $1 million for past and future mental anguish. The decedent's mother and father each received $50,000 for past loss of companionship, $50,000 for future losses, and $50,000 for past and future mental anguish. The jury apportioned 70% liability to the defendant driver and 30% liability to the defendant employer.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Dallas County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver was traveling on a tollway when their vehicle ran out of gas and became disabled. The other driver, who was following behind, struck the disabled vehicle. The first driver claimed injuries to their neck and back. The jury found the second driver 80% liable and the first driver 20% liable.
A driver alleged that a tractor-trailer driver was negligent in causing a rear-end collision. The plaintiff suffered neck and spinal injuries requiring surgery. The defendants disputed causation and the extent of the injuries. The plaintiff claimed the truck driver was under the influence of drugs. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was traveling in Beaumont when their vehicle struck the rear end of a pickup truck. The occupants of the car claimed they suffered injuries. The driver of the pickup truck fled the scene and was never identified. The occupants sued their own insurer for underinsured-motorist benefits. The case proceeded to trial regarding one occupant's claim, with the defense arguing inconsistencies in her account of the accident.
One driver was stopped at an intersection preparing to turn left when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver claimed neck injuries. The other driver's insurer offered its policy limit. The injured driver sued their own insurer for underinsured motorist benefits, alleging the other driver was negligent. The defense questioned the extent of injuries and suggested they were pre-existing.