Conroe, Texas Jury Issues Defense Verdict in Rear-End Collision
One driver was stopped at a red light when the vehicle behind him struck his generator. The driver in front claimed injuries to his back and neck. The driver in the back admitted to dozing off and rolling into the other vehicle. The defense argued the claimed injuries were not caused by the accident.
Case Information Updated: October 2025
Case Outcome
- Outcome
- Verdict-Defense
- Amount
- Undisclosed
- County
- Montgomery County, TX
- Resolved
- 2019
Injury & Accident Details
- Injury Type
- Back Strain / Soft Tissue
- Accident Type
- Rear-end
- Case Type
- Motor Vehicle Negligence
Case Overview
On July 8, 2016, in Conroe, Texas, a construction worker was driving a pickup truck pulling a mobile generator. While stopped at a red light on South Loop 336 at Sgt. Ed Holcombe Boulevard, the generator's rear was struck by a sport utility vehicle. The construction worker, identified as the plaintiff, subsequently claimed neck and back injuries and filed a lawsuit against the other driver, the defendant, alleging negligent vehicle operation.
The defendant admitted dozing off while waiting at the red light, causing the vehicle to roll forward and collide with the plaintiff's equipment. The plaintiff's counsel argued this admission established the defendant's liability for the collision. However, the defense disputed the causation and extent of the claimed injuries, arguing that the vehicle damage was minor.
The plaintiff sought compensation for past medical expenses, lost wages, and pain, detailing treatment for neck and lower back issues, including an emergency room visit, chiropractic care, physical therapy, and an epidural steroid injection. A pain management specialist diagnosed lumbar disc displacement and radiculopathy. The defense presented an orthopedic surgeon who testified that the plaintiff's MRI results were inconsistent with reported pain and that limited physical therapy would have been a reasonable course of treatment for such an accident.
Following a two-day trial, the jury rendered a defense verdict. The jury found that the defendant's negligence, if any, did not proximately cause the "occurrence," which jurors later indicated included the plaintiff's claimed injuries. The jury reportedly agreed with the defense's arguments on causation.
VerdictlyTM Score
This outcome aligns very well with similar cases
This score is calculated by analyzing injury type, accident details, geographic location, temporal trends, and comparing against 2,000+ similar cases in our database.
Need results like this for your case?
Share your situation and we'll connect you with experienced motor vehicle accident attorneys who have handled cases like this in Montgomery County.
Similar cases you may find useful
Handpicked by matching injury type, accident details, and outcome to this case.
One driver stopped in traffic due to construction. The other driver rear-ended the stopped vehicle. The injured driver claimed ankle and back injuries. The defense argued the accident was unavoidable or that the driver acted as an ordinary and prudent driver. The jury found the second driver liable but awarded no damages.
One driver was stopped at a traffic signal when their car was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The driver who caused the collision admitted to being groggy and potentially falling asleep briefly before the impact. The injured driver sought damages for medical expenses and pain.
One driver was stopped at a red light when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was struck claimed injuries to their back, knee, and neck. The case alleged the trailing driver was negligent for failing to maintain a safe distance and control their speed. The jury found the trailing driver liable and awarded damages for past medical expenses.
One driver was stopped in traffic when their vehicle was struck from behind by another vehicle. The driver who was rear-ended claimed injuries to their back and neck. The case proceeded to trial to determine damages, as liability was conceded.
One driver was stopped on a road when their car was struck from behind by another car. This initial impact propelled the stopped car into a third vehicle. The driver of the first car claimed injuries to their back and neck, seeking damages for medical expenses and pain.